<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180393c1f">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>56 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-99-11</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180393c1f</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg99011</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-99-11</reportNumber>
 <subject>Tax law</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Personnel evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Internal audits</subject>
 <subject>Surveys</subject>
 <subject>Sanctions</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Statistical data</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="100" isPrivate="false" number="647"></law>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="206"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>IRS Personnel Administration: Use of Enforcement Statistics in Employee Evaluations</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Internal Revenue
Service&apos;s (IRS) managers&apos; compliance with legislative and policy
prohibitions against using enforcement statistics in employee
evaluations and the requirement that managers certify each quarter
whether violations had occurred, focusing on: (1) the extent to which
IRS&apos; certification process identified violations of law and policy; (2)
IRS employees&apos; perceptions of the use of tax enforcement results in
their annual performance evaluations; (3) supervisors&apos; use of tax
enforcement results in written employee performance evaluations; and (4)
IRS&apos; efforts to revise the certification process.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) for fiscal years 1996 and 1997, district and service
center directors submitted 368 quarterly certifications that reported 11
potential violations; (2) GAO identified several systemic weaknesses
that affected the reliability of the certifications; (3) specifically,
GAO found: (a) some confusion among IRS officials about what constituted
a violation; (b) inadequate guidance about specific actions directors
should take to identify violations; (c) a failure to integrate
performance evaluations and the certification process; and (d) unclear
guidance on sanctions that could be applied against managers for
misusing tax enforcement results or submitting false certifications; (4)
GAO&apos;s survey of a statistically representative sample of examination and
collection employees showed a widespread perception that managers
considered enforcement results when preparing annual performance
evaluations; (5) GAO estimated that 75 percent of front-line employees
and 81 percent of group managers perceived that tax enforcement results
affected their most recent performance evaluation; (6) about 70 percent
of front-line employees said they based their perception in part on
information communicated to them verbally in staff meetings or
performance feedback sessions with their managers; (7) and about 36
percent of front-line employees indicated tax enforcement results were
used in their written performance evaluations; (8) 9 percent of
employees received a written evaluation that contained a tax enforcement
result and an estimated 69 percent contained narrative that employees
could have interpreted as inappropriate references to tax enforcement
results but which did not violate IRS guidance; (9) about 41 percent of
the evaluations in GAO&apos;s sample mentioned process measures dealing with
the age of the cases in the employee&apos;s workload inventory and the number
of cases worked within guidelines established for closing cases; (10)
IRS has undertaken several steps to strengthen the certification
process; (11) although these actions address some of the weaknesses of
the current system, IRS&apos; revised guidance has few examples of the
appropriate and inappropriate use of tax enforcement results in written
evaluations; (12) the revised guidance does not clearly inform managers
about potential sanctions for inappropriate use of tax enforcement
results; and (13) IRS&apos; new independent review process is geared toward
identifying written violations and not violations communicated verbally.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-99-11</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-99-11</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-99-11; IRS Personnel Administration: Use of Enforcement Statistics in Employee Evaluations;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Tax law</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Personnel evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Internal audits</topic>
 <topic>Surveys</topic>
 <topic>Sanctions</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Statistical data</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 647 (100th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 100-647</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 206 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-206</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>