<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f7c3">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-04-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>70 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-73</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f7c3</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98073</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-73</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Collective bargaining</subject>
 <subject>Postal service</subject>
 <subject>Government employee unions</subject>
 <subject>Mechanization</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Postal service employees</subject>
 <identifier>USPS Computerized Forwarding System</identifier>
 <identifier>USPS 1992 Corporate Automation Plan</identifier>
 <identifier>USPS 1996 Corporate Automation Plan</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>U.S. Postal Service: Progress Made in Implementing Automated Letter Sequencing, but Some Issues Remain</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
status of the Postal Service&apos;s (USPS) efforts to implement Delivery
Point Sequencing (DPS), focusing on: (1) USPS goals for DPS
implementation, its projected letter carrier workhour savings, and the
extent to which the Service has achieved these; and (2) issues that may
affect USPS&apos;s ability to achieve its 1998 DPS goals, including any
actions that USPS has taken to address these issues.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) in its 1992 Corporate Automation Plan, USPS
initially scheduled DPS implementation to be completed by
fiscal-year-end 1995; (2) the 1992 Plan included DPS goals and
benchmarks for: (a) DPS equipment deployment; (b) barcoded letter
volume; and (c) delivery zone and carrier route implementation
nationwide through fiscal year (FY) 1995; (3) in addition, USPS based
its analyses that supported investments in DPS sorting equipment on
achieving: (a) a certain DPS letter volume to carrier routes; and (b)
specific carrier workhour savings; (4) however, implementation fell
behind schedule, and USPS acknowledged that it had been overly
optimistic in its DPS expectations; (5) in April 1994, the Postmaster
General announced that the barcoding goal had slipped from 1995 to
fiscal-year-end 1997; (6) in its 1996 Plan, USPS extended the DPS
completion date to the end of FY 1998 and revised associated goals and
benchmarks; (7) USPS has identified and was addressing several issues
that have affected its efforts to achieve its DPS implementation goals,
benchmarks, and carrier workhour savings; (8) to increase volumes of
barcoded letters and letters sorted in delivery sequence, USPS has taken
several actions; (9) while USPS has achieved some success in addressing
issues affecting DPS implementation and achievement of DPS goals, it has
been less successful in resolving its disagreements with the National
Association of Letter Carriers (NALC), the labor union representing city
carriers, regarding DPS implementation; (10) in 1992, USPS and NALC
agreed to work together to implement DPS and signed six memoranda of
understanding, which were to resolve past disputes and provided a plan
for DPS implementation; (11) not long after the memoranda were signed,
disagreements developed between USPS and NALC regarding certain aspects
of the memoranda; (12) NALC filed national level grievances regarding
DPS implementation instructions, and the parties settled most of their
disagreements; (13) however, one disagreement went to national
arbitration, and the arbitrator decided in NALC&apos;s favor and instructed
the parties to work together to resolve their differences; (14) in
addition, many city carriers GAO spoke with said that although they
generally saw benefits in DPS, they were concerned about its effect on
their daily work; and (15) in contrast, USPS officials said that while
DPS has changed the way carriers deliver mail, the changes have not
adversely affected customer service.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-73</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-73</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-73; U.S. Postal Service: Progress Made in Implementing Automated Letter Sequencing, but Some Issues Remain;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Collective bargaining</topic>
 <topic>Postal service</topic>
 <topic>Government employee unions</topic>
 <topic>Mechanization</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Postal service employees</topic>
 <topic>USPS Computerized Forwarding System</topic>
 <topic>USPS 1992 Corporate Automation Plan</topic>
 <topic>USPS 1996 Corporate Automation Plan</topic>
</subject>
</mods>