<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039179a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-10-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>35 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-3</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039179a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98003</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-3</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal regulations</subject>
 <subject>Regulatory agencies</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Executive orders</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="101" isPrivate="false" number="235"></law>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="421"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Regulatory Reform: Agencies&apos; Efforts to Eliminate and Revise Rules Yield Mixed Results</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO updated and expanded its
previous review of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) page
elimination and revision initiative, focusing on whether: (1) agencies&apos;
reported page elimination totals took into account any pages added to
the CFR during the same period; (2) agencies&apos; CFR revision efforts would
reduce regulatory burden; and (3) the administration has any mechanism
in place for measuring burden reductions as a result of its CFR page
elimination and revision initiatives. GAO limited the scope of its work
on the first two objectives to four agencies: the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) and Transportation (DOT), the Department of
Labor&apos;s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) officials in each of the four agencies GAO reviewed
said that the page elimination totals that their agencies reported to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) did not take
into account the pages that their agencies had added to the CFR while
the eliminations were taking place; (2) EPA and DOT estimated that they
added more pages to the CFR than they removed during their page
elimination initiatives; (3) HUD and OSHA, on the other hand, estimated
that they deleted more pages than they added; (4) overall, when
estimated page additions were counted, the 4 agencies&apos; CFR sections
decreased in size by about 926 pages--about 3 percent of the CFR pages
at the start of the initiative, or about 17 percent of the amount
reported to OIRA; (5) the agencies pointed out that pages are often
added to the CFR because of statutory requirements or to clarify
requirements placed on regulated entities and that pages are sometimes
not eliminated at the request of those entities; (6) GAO&apos;s review
indicated that about 40 percent of the 422 CFR revision actions in the 4
agencies would substantively reduce the burden felt by regulated
entities as a result of such actions as eliminating paperwork
requirements and providing compliance flexibility; (7) another 15
percent of the actions appeared to be minor burden reductions in that
they seemed to make the regulations easier to find or to understand but
would not change the underlying regulatory requirements or scope of
applicability; (8) GAO concluded that about 27 percent of the CFR
revision actions would have no effect on the burden felt by regulated
entities and that about 8 percent could increase regulatory burden; (9)
GAO could not determine what effect about 9 percent of the CFR revision
actions would have on the regulated entities, either because the actions
had multiple parts that potentially could offset each other or because
the information available was unclear; (10) OIRA officials said that the
administration has no mechanisms in place for measuring burden
reductions as a result of the CFR page elimination and revision effort;
and (11) however, they believe that the initiative is having a
beneficial effect and also pointed out that the CFR page elimination and
revision efforts are only part of a larger set of actions the
administration is taking to reform the nation&apos;s regulatory system.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-3</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-3</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-3; Regulatory Reform: Agencies&apos; Efforts to Eliminate and Revise Rules Yield Mixed Results;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal regulations</topic>
 <topic>Regulatory agencies</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Executive orders</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 235 (101st Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 101-235</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 421 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-421</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>