<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037aead">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-08-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>23 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-170</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037aead</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98170</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-170</reportNumber>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Agency evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Inspection</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="62"></law>
 <USCode title="19">
                      <section number="58c"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Customs Service: Inspectional Personnel and Workloads</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed certain aspects of the
Customs Service&apos;s inspectional personnel and its commercial cargo and
passenger workloads, focusing on: (1) the implications of any
differences between the cargo and passenger inspectional personnel
levels at selected airports and seaports around the United States and
those determined by Customs to be appropriate for these ports (assessed
levels); and (2) any differences among the cargo and passenger
processing workload-to-inspector ratios at the selected ports and the
rationales for any significant differences in these ratios.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) it was not able to perform the requested analyses to
identify the implications of differences between assessed and actual
inspectional personnel levels because, as GAO reported in April 1998,
Customs had not assessed the appropriate inspectional personnel levels
for its ports; (2) in that report, GAO determined that Customs does not
have a systematic agencywide process for assessing the need for
inspectional personnel and allocating such personnel to commercial cargo
ports; (3) Customs also does not have such a process for assessing the
need for inspectional personnel to process land and sea passengers at
ports; (4) while Customs uses a quantitative model to determine the need
for additional inspectional personnel to process air passengers, the
model is not intended to establish the level at which airports should be
staffed, according to Customs officials; (5) Customs is in the early
stages of responding to a recommendation in GAO&apos;s April 1998 report that
it establish an inspectional personnel needs assessment and allocation
process; (6) Customs officials GAO interviewed at air and sea ports told
GAO that the current personnel levels, coupled with the use of overtime,
enabled the ports to process commercial cargo and passengers within
prescribed performance parameters; (7) the inspectional personnel data
that GAO obtained for the selected ports showed that at the end of
fiscal year 1997, the personnel levels at these ports were at or near
the levels for which funds were provided to the ports; (8) GAO was also
not able to perform the analyses to identify workload-to-inspector
ratios and rationales for any differences in these ratios because it did
not have a sufficient level of confidence in the quality of the workload
data; (9) GAO identified significant discrepancies in the workload data
it obtained from Customs headquarters, a Customs Management Center (CMC)
and two ports; (10) data from the New York CMC indicated that these
airports processed about 1.5 million formal entries alone, almost
100,000 entries more than the number headquarters had for all entries at
these ports; (11) workload was only one of several factors considered by
Customs in the few assessments--which focused on its drug smuggling
initiatives--completed since 1995 to determine its needs for additional
inspectional personnel and allocate such personnel to ports; and (12)
Customs also considered factors such as the threat of drug smuggling,
budgetary constraints, and legislative limitations.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-170</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-170</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-170; Customs Service: Inspectional Personnel and Workloads;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Agency evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Inspection</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 19 Section 58c</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">19 U.S.C. 58c</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 62 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-62</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>