<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039626d">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-09-04</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>68 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-162</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039626d</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98162</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-162</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Personnel evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Accountability</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Employee incentives</subject>
 <subject>Total quality management</subject>
 <identifier>Government Performance and Results Act</identifier>
 <identifier>GPRA</identifier>
 <identifier>TQM</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Performance Management: Aligning Employee Performance With Agency Goals at Six Results Act Pilots</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed selected Government
Performance and Results Act pilot projects, focusing on the: (1) primary
approaches taken by selected pilot projects to align employee
performance management with organizational missions and goals; and (2)
issues or challenges, if any, that these pilot projects commonly
confronted while developing and implementing these approaches.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) although all six pilot projects GAO reviewed
included specific efforts to align their employee performance management
systems with organizational missions and goals, their approaches varied
in significant ways; (2) one way was in the kinds or groups of employees
on whom they focused; (3) four of the pilot projects focused on managers
rather than on staff at other levels; (4) the projects also varied in
the extent to which organizational goals were explicitly reflected in
employees&apos; performance plans, and in whether they emphasized creating
accountability for results at the individual or team level; (5) the two
other pilot projects focused their approaches on essentially all
employees, relying on total quality management principles as a guide and
organizing employees into self-directed work teams; (6) none of the six
pilot projects GAO reviewed reported having formally evaluated its
employee performance management approach, but all reported possible
benefits; (7) the six pilot projects faced several common issues or
challenges; (8) the first of these involved identifying the
flexibilities available to them--including human resource management
(HRM) waivers and demonstration project authority--to tailor their HRM
systems to their organizational missions and goals and other
organizational circumstances or needs; (9) the second issue or challenge
GAO identified involved the six pilot projects&apos; efforts to include in
their performance management approaches appropriate and meaningful goals
and performance measures; (10) third, as the pilot projects worked to
become more performance-based, each was confronted with the need to
redirect its organizational culture toward a new understanding of the
organization&apos;s mission or way of doing business and to secure the buy-in
of employees; (11) the fourth issue GAO identified involved unintended
consequences that pilot project officials said they confronted in
implementing their new approaches, some finding that employees might try
to game the system--that is, manipulate the performance measures to make
their performance look better than it might actually have been--or might
perceive a lack of fairness in the approach&apos;s implementation; and (12)
officials at the six pilot agencies were aware of their employees&apos;
concerns and reported steps they had taken to keep abreast of the views
of the managers and other employees who were the focus of the agencies&apos;
performance management efforts.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-162</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-162</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-162; Performance Management: Aligning Employee Performance With Agency Goals at Six Results Act Pilots;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Personnel evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Accountability</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Employee incentives</topic>
 <topic>Total quality management</topic>
 <topic>Government Performance and Results Act</topic>
 <topic>GPRA</topic>
 <topic>TQM</topic>
</subject>
</mods>