<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180378fdd">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-07-13</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-152</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180378fdd</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98152</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-152</reportNumber>
 <subject>Customer service</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration systems</subject>
 <subject>Telephone</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Systems conversions</subject>
 <subject>Taxpayers</subject>
 <subject>Systems design</subject>
 <subject>ADP procurement</subject>
 <subject>Requirements definition</subject>
 <identifier>IRS Telephone Routing Interactive Systems Project</identifier>
 <identifier>IRS Customer Service Vision</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Tax Administration: IRS&apos; Telephone Routing Interactive System May Not Meet Expectations</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO reviewed the Internal Revenue Service&apos;s (IRS) efforts to develop and
implement its Telephone Routing Interactive System (TRIS), focusing on:
(1) taxpayers&apos; use of TRIS applications; and (2) TRIS&apos; expected benefits
as presented in IRS&apos; business case.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) TRIS is a key component of IRS&apos; plans to improve its
telephone accessibility; (2) as of May 1998, IRS had implemented 9
different applications at all of its 25 customer service centers; (3)
relatively few taxpayers have used TRIS applications, and although IRS
has spent about $53 million on TRIS through February 1998, the system&apos;s
benefits remain uncertain; (4) in fiscal year (FY) 1997, IRS records
showed that about 30 million calls were routed through TRIS; (5) about
300,000 callers used TRIS&apos; applications to obtain information that was
not already available from another system; (6) IRS has not done a
comprehensive assessment of why TRIS applications are not serving more
taxpayers; (7) however, GAO&apos;s review of pilot test reports, TRIS
documents, and IRS officials&apos; comments indicate that IRS may have
automated services that relatively few taxpayers need; (8) IRS officials
told GAO that at the time they made their decision about applications to
include with TRIS, they did not have comprehensive data on the reasons
why taxpayers call IRS; (9) the officials said that applications were
easy to automate; (10) taxpayers may find the interactive applications
difficult to use due to the number of options and the length of system
instructions; (11) also, IRS&apos; restrictions prevent taxpayers with
certain types of cases from using some of the interactive applications,
and IRS has not publicized the services that are available or provided
information on how to use the interactive applications; (12) IRS does
not have a reliable estimate of the benefits that TRIS should provide;
(13) IRS&apos; 1996 benefit estimate is based on several key assumptions that
may no longer be valid; (14) in FY 1997, 3 million callers routed
through TRIS were served by TRIS applications; (15) IRS now plans to
develop only 10 applications itself and contract for the development of
other needed applications; (16) the results of the pilot tests and
subsequent investment evaluation review indicated that the projected
benefits may not be achieved; (17) the evaluation team could not project
a return on investment due to the lack of reliable cost and benefit data
and specifically recommended that TRIS undergo a second evaluation in
1998; and (18) because relatively few taxpayers are using TRIS
applications and many of the system&apos;s projected benefits are uncertain,
IRS&apos; expected role of interactive applications in its efforts to improve
customer service may also be uncertain.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-152</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-152</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-152; Tax Administration: IRS&apos; Telephone Routing Interactive System May Not Meet Expectations;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Customer service</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration systems</topic>
 <topic>Telephone</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Systems conversions</topic>
 <topic>Taxpayers</topic>
 <topic>Systems design</topic>
 <topic>ADP procurement</topic>
 <topic>Requirements definition</topic>
 <topic>IRS Telephone Routing Interactive Systems Project</topic>
 <topic>IRS Customer Service Vision</topic>
</subject>
</mods>