<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180374b17">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-23</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>42 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-128</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180374b17</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98128</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-128</reportNumber>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <subject>Tax return audits</subject>
 <subject>Government collections</subject>
 <subject>Income taxes</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Federal taxes</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <identifier>IRS Coordinated Examination Program</identifier>
 <identifier>IRS Enforcement Revenue Information System</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Tax Administration: IRS Measures Could Provide a More Balanced Picture of Audit Results and Costs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
Internal Revenue Service&apos;s (IRS) measures of the results of its audits
of tax returns, focusing on: (1) how much of the additional taxes
recommended in all types of audits that were closed in fiscal year (FY)
1992 through FY 1997 had been settled or were still in dispute and, if
settled, how much had been assessed and collected as of September 27,
1997; (2) how much of the recommended additional taxes had been assessed
and collected for audits closed in FY 1992; and (3) whether broad IRS
measures of audit results fully represented audit revenues and costs.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) for audits closed in FY 1992 through FY 1997, IRS
recommended tens of billions of dollars in additional taxes for each
year; (2) however, not all recommended taxes are assessed; and not all
assessed taxes are collected; (3) IRS had settled 40 percent of FY 1992
audits without assessing the recommended taxes, usually because of IRS
Office of Appeals&apos; decisions, and had yet to settle the assessment
status of the other 26 percent; (4) of the $8.5 billion assessed, IRS
had collected 72 percent, which means that 25 percent of all recommended
taxes for FY 1992 audits had been collected as of September 27, 1997;
(5) for audits closed in FY 1993 through FY 1997, assessment and
collection results were less complete because less time had elapsed for
these actions to occur compared with 1992; (6) the assessment and
collection rates varied by the type of audit closed in FY 1992; (7) in
general, IRS assessed a higher percentage of the assessed taxes for
simpler audits compared with complex audits; (8) however, IRS collected
a higher percentage of the recommended taxes from the simpler audits
than complex audits; (9) for simpler service center audits, IRS had
assessed 76 percent of the recommended taxes but had collected 56
percent of the assessed taxes as of September 27, 1997; (10) at the
other extreme, after audits of complex returns from Coordinated
Examination Program (CEP) corporations, IRS had assessed 20 percent of
the recommended taxes but had collected 97 percent of the assessed
taxes; (11) as of September 27, 1997, 39 percent of the amounts
recommended in CEP audits were still in dispute; (12) IRS&apos; existing
performance measures do not cover all audit-based revenues or costs;
(13) measuring the taxes recommended does not account for the related
assessments and collections; nor does it account for indirect revenue
gains; (14) measuring other types of revenues are important because not
all recommended taxes are assessed or collected; (15) IRS measures the
staff time directly charged to audits but not the dollar costs of this
direct time; (16) compiling complete and reliable data on the indirect
revenues and taxpayer costs can be very difficult to do because of
limitations in the data sources; (17) beyond these limitations, IRS did
not use other existing data to develop and report measures that more
fully represented audit results; (18) for additional measure, audit
revenues could be compared with related costs; and (19) to develop such
measures, IRS would need more data on both direct and indirect costs.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-128</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-128</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-128; Tax Administration: IRS Measures Could Provide a More Balanced Picture of Audit Results and Costs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>Tax return audits</topic>
 <topic>Government collections</topic>
 <topic>Income taxes</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Federal taxes</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>IRS Coordinated Examination Program</topic>
 <topic>IRS Enforcement Revenue Information System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>