<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803911e0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-04-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>40 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-98-107</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803911e0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98107</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-98-107</reportNumber>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement</subject>
 <subject>Drug trafficking</subject>
 <subject>Presidential budgets</subject>
 <subject>Search and seizure</subject>
 <subject>Smuggling</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <identifier>National Drug Control Strategy</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="62"></law>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="322"></law>
 <USCode title="19">
                      <section number="58c"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="21">
                      <section detail="(c)" number="1502"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Customs Service: Process for Estimating and Allocating Inspectional Personnel</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed selected aspects of
the Custom Service&apos;s drug enforcement operations, focusing on: (1) how
Customs assesses its needs for inspectional personnel and allocates such
resources to commercial cargo ports of entry; (2) whether Customs
received all the additional inspectional personnel its assessments
indicated it needed and, if not, why it did not receive them; and (3)
whether there were any known implications of Customs&apos; not receiving all
of the personnel estimated to be needed and the impact of the additional
personnel that were appropriated on Customs&apos; drug enforcement
operations.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) Customs does not have an agencywide process for
annually determining its need for inspectional personnel--such as
inspectors and canine enforcement officers--for all of its cargo
operations and for allocating these personnel to commercial ports of
entry nationwide; (2) while Customs has moved in this direction by
conducting three inspectional assessments, these assessments: (a)
focused exclusively on the need for additional personnel to implement
Operation Hard Line and similar initiatives; (b) were limited to land
ports along the Southwest border and certain sea and air ports
considered to be at risk from drug smuggling; (c) were conducted each
year using generally different assessment factors; and (d) were
conducted with varying degrees of involvement by Customs headquarters
and field units; (3) Customs conducted the three assessments in
preparation for its fiscal year (FY) 1997, 1998, and 1999 budget request
submissions; (4) for FY 1998 and FY 1999, Customs officials stated that
they used factors such as the number and location of drug seizures and
the perceived threat of drug smuggling, including the use of rail cars
to smuggle drugs; (5) focusing on only a single aspect of its
operations; not consistently including the key field components in the
personnel decisionmaking process; and using different assessment and
allocation factors from year to year could prevent Customs from
accurately estimating the need for inspectional personnel and then
allocating them to ports; (6) the President&apos;s budgets did not request
all of the additional inspectional personnel Customs&apos; assessments
indicated were needed; (7) the President&apos;s FY 1997 budget ultimately
requested 657 additional inspection and other personnel for Customs; (8)
Customs and Department of the Treasury officials cited internal and
external budget constraints, drug enforcement policy considerations, and
legislative requirements as the primary factors affecting the number of
additional personnel that Customs could ultimately request and the
manner in which it could allocate or reallocate certain personnel; (9)
further, for FY 1998, the Office of National Drug Control Policy
directed Customs to reallocate some of the additional 119 inspectors it
requested and was appropriated funds for Southwest border ports in
accordance with the priorities in the National Drug Control Strategy;
and (10) finally, Customs could not move certain existing positions to
the Southwest border because Congress had directed Customs to use them
for specific purposes at specific ports.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-98-107</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-98-107</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-98-107; Customs Service: Process for Estimating and Allocating Inspectional Personnel;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement</topic>
 <topic>Drug trafficking</topic>
 <topic>Presidential budgets</topic>
 <topic>Search and seizure</topic>
 <topic>Smuggling</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>National Drug Control Strategy</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 19 Section 58c</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">19 U.S.C. 58c</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 21 Section 1502(c)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">21 U.S.C. 1502(c)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 62 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-62</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 322 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-322</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>