<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803803b2">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-05-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>29 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-97-58</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803803b2</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg97058</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-97-58</reportNumber>
 <subject>Banking regulation</subject>
 <subject>Bank holding companies</subject>
 <subject>Antitrust law</subject>
 <subject>Credit</subject>
 <subject>Lending institutions</subject>
 <subject>Insurance companies</subject>
 <subject>Brokerage industry</subject>
 <subject>Banking law</subject>
 <subject>Consumer protection</subject>
 <subject>Bank examination</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="91" isPrivate="false" number="607"></law>
 <USCode title="12">
                      <section number="1972"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Bank Oversight: Few Cases of Tying Have Been Detected</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on banks&apos;
compliance with the tying provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act
Amendments of 1970, focusing on: (1) evidence of tying abuses by banks
and their affiliates and regulatory efforts to ensure compliance with
the provisions; (2) views on the tying provisions expressed by
representatives of securities and insurance firms and independent
insurance agents; and (3) views on the tying provisions expressed by
representatives of banks and the Federal Reserve and the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) it found limited evidence of tying activity by
banks; (2) Federal Reserve and OCC officials GAO interviewed were aware
of only one violation identified during routine bank examinations or
hold company inspections since 1990; (3) from January 1990 through
September 1996, the Federal Reserve and OCC received and investigated 13
tying-related complaints, only 3 of which resulted in actions against
the bank or holding company; (4) bank regulators&apos; special investigation
of seven large bank holding companies and four large banks in response
to a 1992 tying complaint identified only one instance of tying that led
to regulatory action; (5) GAO&apos;s interviews with state regulators, small
business groups, and others identified little evidence of tying
violations, although it was suggested that the limited evidence could be
based, at least in part, on borrowers&apos; reluctance to report violations
for fear of jeopardizing their banking relationships; (6) those
representatives of securities and insurance firms and independent
insurance agents GAO contacted that expressed concern about tying
advocated maintaining or strengthening the tying provisions as a way of
offsetting the competitive advantages they believe banks enjoy; (7) some
industry representatives and academic experts interviewed said that a
more important consideration than the banking industry&apos;s share of the
credit market is the availability of credit; (8) bank industry
representatives viewed the tying provisions as impairing banks&apos; ability
to maximize the economic benefits they might otherwise obtain by
offering complementary services; (9) some banking representatives also
said that banks&apos; evolving role as only one of many providers of credit
makes them less able to coerce customers into accepting tied products or
services; (10) with regard to banks&apos; access to the discount window and
federal deposit insurance, banking representatives pointed out that,
with recent legislative changes, it is now easier for the Federal
Reserve to lend directly to various financial firms with liquidity needs
in a crisis, not just banks; (11) while the Federal Reserve chose not to
take an official position on the need for the tying provisions, OCC
cited the provisions&apos; importance in making banks aware of their
responsibilities to customers as they provide an increasing array of
products and services; and (12) some regulatory staff expressed the bel*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-97-58</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-58</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-97-58; Bank Oversight: Few Cases of Tying Have Been Detected;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Banking regulation</topic>
 <topic>Bank holding companies</topic>
 <topic>Antitrust law</topic>
 <topic>Credit</topic>
 <topic>Lending institutions</topic>
 <topic>Insurance companies</topic>
 <topic>Brokerage industry</topic>
 <topic>Banking law</topic>
 <topic>Consumer protection</topic>
 <topic>Bank examination</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 12 Section 1972</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">12 U.S.C. 1972</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 607 (91st Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 91-607</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>