<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180386554">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-04-10</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>44 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-97-36</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180386554</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg97036</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-97-36</reportNumber>
 <subject>Waivers</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Communication</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Budget authority</subject>
 <subject>Reengineering (management)</subject>
 <subject>Accountability</subject>
 <subject>Statutory law</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="5">
                      <section number="551"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>GPRA: Managerial Accountability and Flexibility Pilot Did Not Work As Intended</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO provided information on the
Government Performance and Results Act&apos;s (GPRA) implementation during
the initial pilot phase, fiscal years (FY) 1994 to 1996, focusing on:
(1) whether the managerial accountability and flexibility pilot worked
as intended and the reasons why it did or did not; and (2) the lessons
learned from this pilot and their possible implications for
governmentwide implementation of GPRA.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the GPRA managerial accountability and flexibility
pilot did not work as intended; (2) the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) did not designate any of the 7 departments and 1 independent
agency that submitted a total of 61 waiver proposals as GPRA managerial
accountability and flexibility pilots; (3) three major factors
contributed to the failure of GPRA&apos;s managerial accountability and
flexibility pilot phase to work as intended; (4) first, changes in
federal management practices and laws that occurred after GPRA was
enacted affected agencies&apos; need for the GPRA process; (5) second, GPRA
was not the only means by which agencies could receive waivers from
administrative requirements, and thereby obtain needed managerial
flexibility; (6) third, OMB did not work actively with agencies that
were seeking to take part in the managerial accountability and
flexibility pilot, in contrast to its more proactive posture toward
other GPRA requirements, such as the pilots for the performance planning
and reporting requirements; (7) overall, officials in five of the eight
agencies that submitted a waiver proposal to OMB said that they never
received: (a) feedback from OMB on the status of their waiver proposals;
(b) notification of specific concerns that OMB may have had about the
quality and scope of the proposals; or, most important, (c) explicit
instructions from OMB on how their proposals could be improved to better
meet OMB&apos;s expectations; (8) even though the pilot process did not
result in any GPRA-authorized waivers and thus did not work as intended,
the process provided lessons for agencies and may have important
implications for governmentwide GPRA implementation; (9) while preparing
their waiver requests, several participating agencies learned that the
burdens and constraints that confronted their managers often were
imposed by the agency itself or its parent department and were not the
result of requirements imposed by central management agencies; (10) the
administration&apos;s effort to develop federal management &quot;templates&quot; that,
in part, document the range of flexibility agencies have under existing
central management agency requirements is a promising means for
disseminating knowledge about available flexibility among federal
agencies; and (11) in addition, the pilot experience should provide
useful information for Congress to consider as GPRA is implemented gove*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-97-36</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-36</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-97-36; GPRA: Managerial Accountability and Flexibility Pilot Did Not Work As Intended;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Waivers</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Communication</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Budget authority</topic>
 <topic>Reengineering (management)</topic>
 <topic>Accountability</topic>
 <topic>Statutory law</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 5 Section 551</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">5 U.S.C. 551</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>