<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180380b09">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-07-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>26 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-97-162R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180380b09</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg97162r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-97-162R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Congressional/executive relations</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Public administration</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Information resources management</subject>
 <subject>Financial management</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>The Results Act: Observations on the Department of the Treasury&apos;s July 1997 Draft Strategic Plan</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of the
Treasury&apos;s July 1997 draft strategic plan, focusing on: (1) whether the
draft plan complied with the Government Performance and Results Act; (2)
the plan&apos;s overall quality; (3) whether the Treasury&apos;s key statutory
authorities were reflected; (4) whether discussions about crosscutting
functions and interagency involvement were included; (5) whether the
draft plan addressed major management problems; and (6) Treasury&apos;s
capacity to provide reliable information about its operations and
performance.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) Treasury&apos;s initial draft strategic plan is
incomplete and does not meet the requirements of the Results Act; (2) of
the six elements required by the Act, the Treasury draft plan includes
four; (3) two of those four elements could be made more specific to
better meet the purposes of the act; (4) Treasury&apos;s goals and objectives
are primarily general assertions that do not describe intended outcomes;
(5) the strategies to achieve the goals and objectives do not fully
disclose what specific actions are to be taken, and by which component,
to attain the plan&apos;s goals and objectives; (6) the strategies almost
always fail to meet the Results Act requirements that the plan describe
how the goals and objectives are to be achieved, including a description
of the processes, technology, and other resources needed to meet the
goals and objectives; (7) the draft plan appears to reflect
consideration of Treasury&apos;s major statutory responsibilities; (8)
however, the draft plan is written in such a general way that it is
difficult to determine the extent to which the plan is implementing the
specifics of any particular statutory responsibility; (9) the draft plan
does not adequately address crosscutting issues and does not mention
whether Treasury coordinated with other federal departments and agencies
where they share related functions; (10) although a major part of the
mission statement is focused on management, the draft plan does not
adequately address some of the critical management problems facing
Treasury that could affect its ability to achieve its strategic goals
and objectives; (11) while some of these issues may be addressed in
component plans, Treasury&apos;s draft plan&apos;s discussion of the management
mission is incomplete without some consideration of its role in
resolving these problems; (12) GAO and the Treasury Inspector General
have long reported on problems with the reliability of information
systems, both program-related and financial, within the Department; (13)
the draft plan identifies goals, objectives, and strategies under
Treasury&apos;s management mission that are aimed at addressing the capacity
of the Department to provide reliable data and modernize information
systems; and (14) the draft plan does not address how data reliablity
and information systems currently affect Treasury&apos;s ability to measure
performance or provide necessary information to permit Congress to
assess the Department&apos;s progress toward its goals.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-97-162R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-162R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-97-162R; The Results Act: Observations on the Department of the Treasury&apos;s July 1997 Draft Strategic Plan;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Congressional/executive relations</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Public administration</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Information resources management</topic>
 <topic>Financial management</topic>
</subject>
</mods>