<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180377027">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-07-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>40 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-97-150R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180377027</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg97150r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-97-150R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Management information systems</subject>
 <subject>Federal employee retirement programs</subject>
 <subject>Congressional/executive relations</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Information resources management</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <identifier>OPM Central Personnel Data File</identifier>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>The Results Act: Observations on OPM&apos;s May 1997 Draft Strategic Plan</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Office of
Personnel Management&apos;s (OPM) May 1997 draft strategic plan, focusing on:
(1) whether the draft strategic plan contained each of the six
components required by the Government Performance and Results Act and
assessed the components&apos; strengths and weaknesses; (2) whether OPM&apos;s key
statutory authorities were reflected; (3) whether discussions about
crosscutting functions and interagency coordination were included; (4)
whether the draft plan addressed major management challenges; and (5)
OPM&apos;s capacity to provide reliable information about operations and
performance.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) of the six components required by the Act, two--how
the goals and objectives will be achieved and relating performance goals
to general goals and objectives--were not specifically identified in the
draft plan; (2) the remaining four components--mission statement, goals
and objectives, external factors, and program evaluations--were
discussed in the draft plan; (3) however, each of these components had
weaknesses, some of more significance than others; (4) the four
identified components generally contained some, but not all, of the
attributes that would be desirable to meet the purpose of the Act and to
be consistent with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance, or
that might be expected in a stand-alone explanation of OPM&apos;s planned
strategy for the next 5 years; (5) OPM&apos;s draft plan could better meet
the purposes of the Act and OMB guidance if it contained a
well-developed discussion of statutory authorities, crosscutting issues,
and management problems; (6) OPM&apos;s draft plan does not discuss OPM&apos;s key
statutory authorities, which could help OPM&apos;s stakeholders better
understand the diversity and complexity of OPM&apos;s overall mission as well
as the challenges the agency faces in carrying out its mission; (7) the
plan does identify a number of crosscutting issues; (8) since OPM had
not met with stakeholders before developing its plan--as officials
stated in their initial consultation with House consulting team
members--the draft plan is silent on the Results Act required
coordination; (9) in addition, the draft plan does not discuss the
status of OPM&apos;s efforts to address the formidable federal personnel
management problems that have been identified over the years; (10) such
a discussion in the plan could assist OPM in the process of refining its
goals and objectives as well as inform stakeholders of problems that
could impede OPM&apos;s efforts to achieve its goals and objectives; (11)
OPM&apos;s draft plan contains little discussion of the information systems
that directly support OPM&apos;s role as the administrator and fiduciary for
federal employees&apos; benefit programs; (12) these systems are the source
of performance information for gauging how well OPM carries out its
stewardship of the benefit programs; (13) a discussion of these systems
would be valuable to stakeholders since an independent accountant found
that key financial systems did not adequately support OPM&apos;s financial
statements for the Retirement Program and the Health Benefits Program;
and (14) other information systems, such as the Central Personnel Data
File (CPDF), are also key to assessing OPM&apos;s performance but are not
mentioned in the plan.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-97-150R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-97-150R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-97-150R; The Results Act: Observations on OPM&apos;s May 1997 Draft Strategic Plan;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Management information systems</topic>
 <topic>Federal employee retirement programs</topic>
 <topic>Congressional/executive relations</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Information resources management</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>OPM Central Personnel Data File</topic>
</subject>
</mods>