<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037dd6e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-03-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>58 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-96-75</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037dd6e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg96075</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-96-75</reportNumber>
 <subject>Small business assistance</subject>
 <subject>Research and development</subject>
 <subject>Manufacturing industry</subject>
 <subject>Technical assistance</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Productivity</subject>
 <subject>Systems conversions</subject>
 <subject>Surveys</subject>
 <identifier>NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD Technology Reinvestment Project</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Manufacturing Extension Programs: Manufacturers&apos; Views About Delivery and Impact of Services</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO surveyed manufacturers&apos; views
regarding the impact of manufacturing extension programs (MEP), focusing
on: (1) factors contributing to the positive impact of overall business
performance reported by the majority of survey respondents; (2) whether
companies&apos; expectations were met regarding MEP impact on specific
business performance indicators; and (3) whether companies thought that
MEP actually demonstrated attributes they valued most.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the results of its survey could not be applied to
all MEP participants or all MEP service categories; (2) companies that
supplemented MEP assistance with their own resources, implemented more
MEP recommendations, were small and relatively new, and did not pay fees
for MEP assistance were more likely to view the MEP program positively;
(3) the source of MEP funding did not influence companies&apos; views of the
assistance&apos;s impact; (4) National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) officials believed that NIST support improved MEP programs&apos;
efficiency and effectiveness and made MEP services more widely
available; (5) about two-thirds to three-quarters of the companies that
expected MEP assistance to enhance specific business indicators believed
that the results met or exceeded their expectations; and (6) over 90
percent of the companies rated staff expertise, timely assistance, and
reasonably priced MEP service fees and project proposals as important
MEP features and most were satisfied with their specific MEP programs in
these areas.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-96-75</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-75</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-96-75; Manufacturing Extension Programs: Manufacturers&apos; Views About Delivery and Impact of Services;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Small business assistance</topic>
 <topic>Research and development</topic>
 <topic>Manufacturing industry</topic>
 <topic>Technical assistance</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Productivity</topic>
 <topic>Systems conversions</topic>
 <topic>Surveys</topic>
 <topic>NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership</topic>
 <topic>DOD Technology Reinvestment Project</topic>
</subject>
</mods>