<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039d656">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-05-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>30 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-96-43</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039d656</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg96043</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-96-43</reportNumber>
 <subject>Tax credit</subject>
 <subject>Statistical methods</subject>
 <subject>Data collection operations</subject>
 <subject>Research and development costs</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <subject>Fiscal policies</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Research and development</subject>
 <subject>Tax returns</subject>
 <identifier>Research Tax Credit</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Tax Policy and Administration: Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of the Research Tax Credit</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed eight studies of the
research tax credit, focusing on the: (1) adequacy of the studies&apos; data
and methods to determine the amount of research spending stimulated per
dollar of foregone tax revenue; and (2) other factors that determine the
credit&apos;s value to society.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) four studies supported the claim that, during the
1980s, the research credit stimulated research spending that exceeded
its revenue cost, but the other four studies did not support the claim
or were inconclusive; (2) all of the studies had significant data and
methodological limitations that made it difficult to evaluate industry&apos;s
true responsiveness to the research tax credit; (3) the studies did not
use tax return data to determine the credit&apos;s incentive because the
authors did not qualify for access to such data; (4) publicly available
data were not a suitable substitute for the tax return data because
public sources used different definitions of taxable income and research
spending; (5) the studies&apos; analytical methods, such as use of industry
aggregates and failure to incorporate important tax code interactions,
made their findings imprecise and uncertain; (6) there was little
research on the latest design of the credit to determine its effect on
incentives and costs; (7) the studies&apos; evidence was not adequate to
conclude that a dollar of research tax credit would stimulate a dollar
of additional short-term research spending or about two dollars of
additional long-term research spending; and (8) to measure the credit&apos;s
true impact, the studies would need to assess the research&apos;s net benefit
to society, resource costs of research, and administrative, compliance,
and efficiency costs of funding the credit.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-96-43</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-96-43</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-96-43; Tax Policy and Administration: Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of the Research Tax Credit;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Tax credit</topic>
 <topic>Statistical methods</topic>
 <topic>Data collection operations</topic>
 <topic>Research and development costs</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>Fiscal policies</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Research and development</topic>
 <topic>Tax returns</topic>
 <topic>Research Tax Credit</topic>
</subject>
</mods>