<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038792e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-03-15</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>51 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-95-37</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038792e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg95037</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-95-37</reportNumber>
 <subject>Bank failures</subject>
 <subject>Financial management</subject>
 <subject>Insured commercial banks</subject>
 <subject>Financial institutions</subject>
 <subject>Bank management</subject>
 <subject>Bank examination</subject>
 <subject>Banking law</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <identifier>Bank Insurance Fund</identifier>
 <identifier>BIF</identifier>
 <identifier>Dallas (TX)</identifier>
 <identifier>Houston (TX)</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Failing Banks: Lessons Learned from Resolving First City Bancorporation of Texas</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In fewer than five years, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) was called upon twice to resolve the financial problems of the
federally insured banks of the First City Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.
In April 1988, FDIC provided about $970 million in an attempt to restore
First City&apos;s financial health.  Four years later, the two largest First
City banks were deemed insolvent, and FDIC was appointed receiver of all
20 First City banks.  This report answers the following four questions:
Regarding the first resolution, why did the FDIC Board of Directors
decide to resolve First City&apos;s financial difficulties in 1988 by
providing financial help instead of using other available resolution
alternatives? Regarding the second resolution, why did FDIC&apos;s estimate
of the Bank Insurance Fund costs to resolve First City at the time of
the 1992 failure differ so from the estimate when the banks were sold
the following year? What, if any, additional cost to the Fund is
expected from the second resolution of First City? What lessons does the
First City experience offer relevant to the assistance, closure, and
resolution process?</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-95-37</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-37</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-95-37; Failing Banks: Lessons Learned from Resolving First City Bancorporation of Texas;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Bank failures</topic>
 <topic>Financial management</topic>
 <topic>Insured commercial banks</topic>
 <topic>Financial institutions</topic>
 <topic>Bank management</topic>
 <topic>Bank examination</topic>
 <topic>Banking law</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Bank Insurance Fund</topic>
 <topic>BIF</topic>
 <topic>Dallas (TX)</topic>
 <topic>Houston (TX)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>