<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a4add">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-07-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>67 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-95-171</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a4add</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg95171</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-95-171</reportNumber>
 <subject>State taxes</subject>
 <subject>Multinational corporations</subject>
 <subject>Accounting procedures</subject>
 <subject>Financial records</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <subject>Income taxes</subject>
 <subject>Tax law</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration systems</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Tax Policy and Administration: California Taxes on Multinational Corporations and Related Federal Issues</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on: (1)
California&apos;s experience in conducting formulary apportionment audits of
multinational corporations; and (2) issues that would have to be
considered before adopting a formulary system at the federal level.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) under worldwide formulary apportionment, California
first had to determine whether California corporations that were part of
a multinational enterprise were engaged in a unitary business with
affiliated U.S. and foreign corporations based on an analysis of the
enterprise&apos;s ownership and business operations; (2) auditors then used
the parent enterprise&apos;s financial records, particularly its federal tax
returns and audited financial statements, to ensure that state tax was
based on the income and the apportionment factors for all corporations
comprising the unitary business; (3) California assessed millions of
dollars of additional state taxes based on unity determinations, but
corporations contested most of the additional assessments; (4)
California adjusted for U.S. and foreign accounting standards and
recordkeeping differences that had material impacts on its audits; (5)
because taxpayers did not always supply requested information, the
auditors used estimates and assumptions in making their adjustments; (6)
matters that need to be considered before adopting formulary
apportionment at the federal level include the design and administration
of a federal unitary system, how to reconcile accounting rules
differences and obtain and verify financial information, and the
transition from a separate accounting system to a unitary system; and
(7) tax experts do not agree on whether problems associated with a
unitary system could be resolved.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-95-171</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-95-171</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-95-171; Tax Policy and Administration: California Taxes on Multinational Corporations and Related Federal Issues;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>State taxes</topic>
 <topic>Multinational corporations</topic>
 <topic>Accounting procedures</topic>
 <topic>Financial records</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>Income taxes</topic>
 <topic>Tax law</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration systems</topic>
</subject>
</mods>