<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039b8d3">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-04-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-94-78</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-78</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039b8d3</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg94078</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-78</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-78</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-94-78</reportNumber>
 <subject>Postal service</subject>
 <subject>Mail transportation operations</subject>
 <subject>Mail delivery problems</subject>
 <subject>Productivity</subject>
 <subject>Postal facilities</subject>
 <subject>Regional planning</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Centralization</subject>
 <identifier>Waterloo (IA)</identifier>
 <identifier>Mason City (IA)</identifier>
 <identifier>Mankato (MN)</identifier>
 <identifier>Albert Lea (MN)</identifier>
 <identifier>Blue Earth (MN)</identifier>
 <identifier>Decorah (IA)</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Postal Service: Planned Benefits of Iowa Automated Mail Facility Not Realized</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Automation at the Waterloo, Iowa, mail processing facility did not yield
financial savings as the Postal Service had planned, nor did it improve
productivity and delivery service.  After the consolidation of mail
operations in Mason City and Waterloo, mail processing workhours
declined as expected in Mason City, but the workhour increase in
Waterloo was larger than anticipated, and the combined hours for both
facilities rose sharply.  Despite the introduction of automation
equipment, labor productivity declined. Transportation costs, instead of
decreasing as planned, increased because of equipment upgrades and route
changes.  Although local overnight service in Mason City was maintained,
some locations were no longer scheduled to receive overnight mail
delivery, and the percentage of mail delivered on time to other
overnight locations fell.  Contrary to Postal Service guidelines,
officials have not reviews the consolidations to determine whether their
goals were attained.  GAO believes that the Service should do such
reviews to determine if consolidations in rural areas benefit the
Service and its customers.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-78/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-78.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-94-78</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-78</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-94-78; Postal Service: Planned Benefits of Iowa Automated Mail Facility Not Realized;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Postal service</topic>
 <topic>Mail transportation operations</topic>
 <topic>Mail delivery problems</topic>
 <topic>Productivity</topic>
 <topic>Postal facilities</topic>
 <topic>Regional planning</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Centralization</topic>
 <topic>Waterloo (IA)</topic>
 <topic>Mason City (IA)</topic>
 <topic>Mankato (MN)</topic>
 <topic>Albert Lea (MN)</topic>
 <topic>Blue Earth (MN)</topic>
 <topic>Decorah (IA)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>