<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f8f3">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-02-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-94-67</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-67</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f8f3</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg94067</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-67</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-67</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-94-67</reportNumber>
 <subject>Workers compensation</subject>
 <subject>Physicians</subject>
 <subject>Payments</subject>
 <subject>Medical examinations</subject>
 <subject>Compensation claims</subject>
 <subject>Medical fees</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility determinations</subject>
 <subject>Disability benefits</subject>
 <subject>Personnel recruiting</subject>
 <subject>Computerized information systems</subject>
 <identifier>DOL Physician Directory System</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="5">
                      <section number="8107"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="39">
                      <section detail="et seq." number="3901"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Employees&apos; Compensation Act: No Evidence That Labor&apos;s Physician Selection Processes Biased Claims Decisions</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Claimants and their representatives have alleged that the Labor
Department&apos;s Office of Workers&apos; Compensation Programs lacks objectivity
and has &quot;shopped&quot; for doctors who, when examining claimants, would be
predisposed against supporting their claims for workers&apos; compensation
benefits.  GAO did not find this to be the case.  When claimants&apos;
benefits were terminated after a second-opinion examination, these
adjustments were usually unrelated to conflicts in medical evidence that
would have required an impartial medical examination.  Also, the Office
has an automated system--the Physician Directory System--in place to
ensure that physicians were chosen in an unbiased manner.  Finally,
given the number of impartial medical examinations done by individual
doctors and the amounts paid to those who did both second-opinion
examinations and impartial medical examinations, it seems unlikely that
the Office was repeatedly using the same doctors to achieve
predetermined results.  Yet, there have been situations in which
districts have been unable to use the Physician Directory System when
choosing doctors to do impartial medical examinations.  It would be in
the Office&apos;s best interest to establish controls to ensure the impartial
selection of doctors whenever methods other than the Physician Directory
System are used to select doctors.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-67/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-67.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-94-67</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-67</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-94-67; Federal Employees&apos; Compensation Act: No Evidence That Labor&apos;s Physician Selection Processes Biased Claims Decisions;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Workers compensation</topic>
 <topic>Physicians</topic>
 <topic>Payments</topic>
 <topic>Medical examinations</topic>
 <topic>Compensation claims</topic>
 <topic>Medical fees</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility determinations</topic>
 <topic>Disability benefits</topic>
 <topic>Personnel recruiting</topic>
 <topic>Computerized information systems</topic>
 <topic>DOL Physician Directory System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 5 Section 8107</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">5 U.S.C. 8107</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 39 Section 3901et seq.</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">39 U.S.C. 3901et seq.</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>