<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038748b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993-10-01</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-94-15</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-15</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038748b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg94015</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-15</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-15</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-94-15</reportNumber>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Federal corporations</subject>
 <subject>Executive compensation</subject>
 <subject>Salary increases</subject>
 <subject>Employee incentives</subject>
 <subject>Oversight by Congress</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Budget authority</subject>
 <subject>Funds management</subject>
 <subject>Merit compensation</subject>
 <identifier>RTC Executive Bonus Program</identifier>
 <identifier>FDIC Executive Bonus Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Senior Executive Service</identifier>
 <identifier>SES</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Executive Bonuses: Information on FDIC&apos;s and RTC&apos;s Executive Bonus Programs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Was it reasonable for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
and the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) to pay sizable bonuses to
their executives during 1991 and 1992, especially given the ongoing
recession and the decision by other financial regulatory institutions to
award much smaller bonuses to top management? GAO concludes that the
bonus decisions at FDIC, RTC, and other financial institution agencies
are a matter of executive judgment because each has authority to set the
compensation of its employees and no law limits the number or amount of
bonuses that can be paid to their executives.  FDIC&apos;s and RTC&apos;s bonus
programs seemed to generally incorporate the controls required for
Senior Executive Service (SES) bonus programs, with two exceptions that
relate to establishing formal performance review boards and to setting
individual performance plans for each executive at the start of
performance periods.  The absence of these controls can have some
detrimental effects.  Given the subjective nature of performance
appraisals and the authority of agency heads to make final bonus
decisions, however, it would be difficult to conclude that the bonus
decisions at FDIC and RTC would have been any different if the controls
required in the SES program had been a part of the bonus programs at the
two agencies.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-15/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-15.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-94-15</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-94-15</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-94-15; Executive Bonuses: Information on FDIC&apos;s and RTC&apos;s Executive Bonus Programs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Federal corporations</topic>
 <topic>Executive compensation</topic>
 <topic>Salary increases</topic>
 <topic>Employee incentives</topic>
 <topic>Oversight by Congress</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Budget authority</topic>
 <topic>Funds management</topic>
 <topic>Merit compensation</topic>
 <topic>RTC Executive Bonus Program</topic>
 <topic>FDIC Executive Bonus Program</topic>
 <topic>Senior Executive Service</topic>
 <topic>SES</topic>
</subject>
</mods>