<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803909f9">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-04-06</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>52 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-00-89</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803909f9</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg00089</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-00-89</reportNumber>
 <subject>Derivative securities</subject>
 <subject>Stock exchanges</subject>
 <subject>Stocks (securities)</subject>
 <subject>Securities regulation</subject>
 <subject>Commodity futures</subject>
 <subject>Futures</subject>
 <subject>Restrictive trade practices</subject>
 <subject>Jurisdictional authority</subject>
 <subject>Hedging</subject>
 <identifier>Shad-Johnson Jurisdictional Accord</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>CFTC and SEC: Issues Related to the Shad-Johnson</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC) and the issues the two have in relation to the Shad-Johnson
Jurisdictional Accord, focusing on: (1) the extent to which U.S.
securities, foreign futures, and over-the-counter (OTC) markets trade
stock-based derivatives that are economically similar to the futures
prohibited from trading by the accord; (2) the potential effect of the
accord trading prohibitions on derivatives market participants; (3)
concerns about calls to repeal the accord trading prohibitions; and (4)
jurisdictional and other approaches to addressing these concerns.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) U.S. securities, foreign futures, and OTC markets
trade derivatives that are based on single stocks and stock indexes; (2)
however, the Shad-Johnson Jurisdictional Accord precludes U.S. futures
exchanges from trading futures on single stocks and certain stock
indexes; (3) specifically, U.S. securities exchanges trade options on
over 2,600 single stocks; (4) in addition, 9 foreign exchanges trade
single stock futures on at least 189 foreign stocks; (5) as of year-end
1998, the equity swaps market worldwide had an estimated total notional
value of $146 billion, accounting for a fraction of a percent of the
total notional value of the OTC derivatives market worldwide; (6)
although investors can use stock-based options and equity swaps to hedge
price risk, they cannot use stock-based futures to the same extent
because of the accord prohibitions on single stock and certain stock
index futures; (7) some futures industry officials have said that the
accord prohibitions should be repealed, because they have restricted
U.S. futures exchanges from competing with other markets that trade
derivatives on single stocks and narrow-based stock indexes; (8) in
response to calls to repeal the accord trading prohibitions, SEC, the
U.S. securities exchanges, the President&apos;s Working Group on Financial
Markets, and several members of Congress have expressed concerns about
doing so without first resolving applicable differences between
securities and commodities laws and regulations; (9) their concerns
center on the potential for single stock and certain stock index futures
to be used as substitutes for single stocks to circumvent federal
securities laws and regulations; (10) according to SEC and securities
exchange officials, the prohibited futures could be allowed to trade, if
they were regulated as securities; (11) these officials said that such
an approach would enable SEC to ensure that stocks and stock-based
derivatives were regulated consistently; (12) in response to
congressional requests for action, SEC and CFTC have agreed to an
approach that would allow single stock futures to be traded on both U.S.
securities and future exchanges; and (13) under this approach, the
agencies would jointly regulate such futures, the intermediaries that
offered them, and the markets that traded them.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-00-89</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-89</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-00-89; CFTC and SEC: Issues Related to the Shad-Johnson;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Derivative securities</topic>
 <topic>Stock exchanges</topic>
 <topic>Stocks (securities)</topic>
 <topic>Securities regulation</topic>
 <topic>Commodity futures</topic>
 <topic>Futures</topic>
 <topic>Restrictive trade practices</topic>
 <topic>Jurisdictional authority</topic>
 <topic>Hedging</topic>
 <topic>Shad-Johnson Jurisdictional Accord</topic>
</subject>
</mods>