<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a5773">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-02-22</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>39 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-00-69</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a5773</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg00069</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-00-69</reportNumber>
 <subject>Police</subject>
 <subject>Police training</subject>
 <subject>Personnel recruiting</subject>
 <subject>Federal aid for criminal justice</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Federal aid to states</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement personnel</subject>
 <identifier>DOJ Police Corps Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Florida</identifier>
 <identifier>Maryland</identifier>
 <identifier>Oregon</identifier>
 <identifier>Texas</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="322"></law>
 <USCode title="31">
                      <section detail="(a)" number="1301"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="42">
                      <section detail="et seq." number="14091"></section>
                      <section number="14093"></section>
                      <section detail="(a)(4)(A)" number="14095"></section>
                      <section detail="(a)(4)" number="14097"></section>
                      <section number="2"></section>
                      <section detail="(b)" number="3788"></section>
                      <section number="8"></section>
                </USCode>
 <congReport congress="105" number="825" type="CONF"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Police Corps: Some Problems Resolved, But Most Positions</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request for information regarding how the
Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented the Police Corps program
under the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) office and, more
recently, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), focusing on: (1) delays
in Police Corps program implementation; and (2) the provision of funds
by the Office of the Police Corps.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Police Corps program got off to a slower than
expected start resulting in the majority of participant slots remaining
unfilled; (2) as of September 30, 1999, 4303 of the 1, 007 participant
positions funded for fiscal years 1996 through 1998 had been filled; (3)
according to federal and state officials, two of the factors that
contributed to this slow start were as follows: (a) COPS dedicated
insufficient staff to the Police Corps program, which led to delays in
providing program guidance, processing program applications and
payments, and answering participants&apos; questions about the program; and
(b) the Police Corps statute did not provide funding to pay states&apos;
costs for program administration or for recruitment and selection of
program participants; (4) COPS operation of the Police Corps as a direct
reimbursement program made determining program status difficult, as it
slowed the rate at which funds were obligated; (5) according to a DOJ
official, COPS based its decision to operate the Police Corps program as
a direct reimbursement program on the language of the statute; (6) under
direct reimbursement, funds were not considered obligated when state
plans were approved; (7) instead, COPS considered funds obligated only
when an individual check had been sent to a college or university,
in-service Police Corps officer, approved law enforcement training
provider, or participating police department; (8) on December 10, 1998,
responsibility for the Police Corps program was transferred from COPS to
OJP; (9) OJP devoted seven full-time staff positions to process program
applications and payments and respond to participant queries faster;
(10) under the authority granted OJP under 42 U.S.C. 3788(b), which
allowed OJP to enter into interagency agreements with states on a
reimbursable basis, OJP opted, through the use of such agreements, to
make a formula payment that can be used to help defray states&apos;
recruiting and administrative costs; (11) this authority was not
available to COPS; (12) while these interagency agreements only recently
went into effect, they should make money more readily available to
states trying to implement their Police Corps programs; (13) as of
September 30, 1999, OJP had obligated $51.3 million of the $82.4 million
available to the program; and (14) it is too early to determine the
effects of the transfer of the Police Corps program from COPS to OJP on
the factors contributing to the slow start.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-00-69</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-69</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-00-69; Police Corps: Some Problems Resolved, But Most Positions;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Police</topic>
 <topic>Police training</topic>
 <topic>Personnel recruiting</topic>
 <topic>Federal aid for criminal justice</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Federal aid to states</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement personnel</topic>
 <topic>DOJ Police Corps Program</topic>
 <topic>Florida</topic>
 <topic>Maryland</topic>
 <topic>Oregon</topic>
 <topic>Texas</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 31 Section 1301(a)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">31 U.S.C. 1301(a)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 14091et seq.</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 14093</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 14095(a)(4)(A)</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 14097(a)(4)</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 2</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 3788(b)</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 8</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 14091et seq.</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 14093</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 14095(a)(4)(A)</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 14097(a)(4)</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 2</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 3788(b)</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 8</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 322 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-322</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Conference Report 825 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">Conf. Rept. 105-825</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>