<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039def3">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-09-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>36 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-00-204</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039def3</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg00204</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-00-204</reportNumber>
 <subject>Productivity in government</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Data collection</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <identifier>APHIS Mediterranean Fruit Fly Exclusion and Detection</identifier>
 <identifier>Program</identifier>
 <identifier>SAMHSA Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block</identifier>
 <identifier>Grant Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Upward Bound Program</identifier>
 <identifier>DOL Welfare-to-Work Grant</identifier>
 <identifier>HHS Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Program Evaluation: Studies Helped Agencies Measure or</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed how federal agencies
used evaluation studies to report on their achievements, focusing on:
(1) how program evaluation studies or methods served in performance
reporting; and (2) circumstances that led agencies to conduct
evaluations.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) evaluations helped the agencies improve their
measurement of program performance or understanding of performance and
how it might be improved--some studies did both; (2) to help improve
their performance measurement, two agencies used the findings of
effectiveness evaluations to provide data on program results that were
otherwise unavailable; (3) one agency supported a number of studies to
help states prepare the groundwork for and pilot-test future performance
measures; (4) another used evaluation methods to validate the accuracy
of existing performance data; (5) to better understand program
performance, one agency reported evaluation and audit findings to
address other, operational concerns about the program; (6) four agencies
drew on evaluations to explain the reasons for observed performance or
identify ways to improve performance; (7) three agencies compared their
program&apos;s results with estimates of what might have happened in the
program&apos;s absence in order to assess their program&apos;s net impact or
contribution to results; (8) two of the evaluations GAO reviewed were
initiated in response to legislative provisions, but most of the studies
were self-initiated by agencies in response to concerns about the
program&apos;s performance or about the availability of outcome data; (9)
some studies were initiated by agencies for reasons unrelated to meeting
Government Performance and Results Act requirements and thus served
purposes beyond those they were designed to address; (10) in some cases,
evaluations were launched to identify the reasons for poor program
performance and learn how that could be remedied; (11) in other cases,
agencies initiated special studies because they faced challenges in
collecting outcome data on an ongoing basis; (12) one departmentwide
study was initiated in order to direct attention to an issue that cut
across program boundaries and agencies&apos; responsibilities; (13) as
agencies governmentwide update their strategic and performance plans,
the examples in this report might help them identify ways that
evaluations can contribute to understanding their programs&apos; performance;
and (14) these cases also provide some examples of ways agencies might
leverage their evaluation resources through: (a) drawing on the findings
of a wide array of evaluations and audits; (b) making multiple use of an
evaluations findings; (c) mining existing databases; and (d)
collaborating with state and local program partners to develop mutually
useful performance data.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-00-204</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-204</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-00-204; Program Evaluation: Studies Helped Agencies Measure or;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Productivity in government</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Data collection</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>APHIS Mediterranean Fruit Fly Exclusion and Detection</topic>
 <topic>Program</topic>
 <topic>SAMHSA Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block</topic>
 <topic>Grant Program</topic>
 <topic>Upward Bound Program</topic>
 <topic>DOL Welfare-to-Work Grant</topic>
 <topic>HHS Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>