<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037fdda">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>24 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-00-135R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037fdda</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg00135r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-00-135R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Information technology</subject>
 <subject>Standards and standardization</subject>
 <subject>Regulatory agencies</subject>
 <subject>Agency proceedings</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Information resources management</subject>
 <subject>Electronic publications</subject>
 <subject>Electronic government</subject>
 <subject>Web sites</subject>
 <subject>Internet</subject>
 <identifier>DOT Docket Management System</identifier>
 <identifier>USDA National Organic Program</identifier>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="40"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Rulemaking: Agencies&apos; Use of Information</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed how federal agencies
are using information technology (IT) to facilitate public participation
in the rulemaking process, focusing on the: (1) potentially beneficial
uses of IT in the rulemaking process that have not yet been adopted by
federal agencies; and (2) benefits and drawbacks of standardizing
innovative uses of IT across multiple agencies.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) all five of the regulatory agencies that GAO
examined were using some form of IT to notify the public about
opportunities to participate in rulemaking and to facilitate the receipt
of public comments; (2) all of these agencies had web sites that
conveyed rulemaking information to the public or maintained some
rulemaking records in electronic form, and all of them accepted
electronic comments for at least some of their proposed rules; (3)
however, the specific features and uses of IT differed significantly
between and sometimes within the agencies; (4) for example, the
Department of Transportation (DOT) had established an Internet web site
that housed regulatory information for every agency within DOT and was
searchable in a variety of ways; (5) other agencies either had no such
information electronically available or the nature of the information
available varied from one part of DOT to another; (6) some of the
agencies were beginning to use targeted, proactive notifications of
forthcoming rules, and some were experimenting with interactive comment
processes; (7) the individuals and organizations with whom GAO spoke did
not identify any potentially beneficial IT-based public participation
applications that had not been adopted by at least one of the regulatory
agencies that GAO examined; (8) however, some of them indicated that
certain IT practices should be more widely used; (9) several individuals
and organizations suggested that agencies move to a more consistent
organization, content, and presentation of information to allow for a
more common &quot;look and feel&quot; to agencies&apos; IT-based public participation
mechanisms in rulemaking; (10) although some of the individuals and
organizations that GAO contacted said that standardization of IT-based
public participation innovations across agencies could lead to more
participation in the rulemaking process, the agency representatives that
GAO contacted generally did not believe that cross-agency
standardization was either necessary or appropriate; (11) they said that
each agency needed to develop systems appropriate for their particular
circumstances and that there were no data indicating that the lack of
standardization was a problem, or that standardization would improve
either the quantity or the quality of the participation that agencies
receive during the rulemaking process; and (12) they also said that
standardization would require substantial resources and that those
resources might be better used in other endeavors.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-00-135R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-135R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-00-135R; Federal Rulemaking: Agencies&apos; Use of Information;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Information technology</topic>
 <topic>Standards and standardization</topic>
 <topic>Regulatory agencies</topic>
 <topic>Agency proceedings</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Information resources management</topic>
 <topic>Electronic publications</topic>
 <topic>Electronic government</topic>
 <topic>Web sites</topic>
 <topic>Internet</topic>
 <topic>DOT Docket Management System</topic>
 <topic>USDA National Organic Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 40 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-40</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>