<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039fc70">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-05-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>28 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-00-100</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039fc70</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg00100</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-00-100</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Health insurance</subject>
 <subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject>
 <subject>Corporate mergers</subject>
 <subject>Insurance premiums</subject>
 <subject>Employee medical benefits</subject>
 <subject>Health resources utilization</subject>
 <identifier>Federal Employees Health Benefits Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Employees&apos; Health Program: Reasons Why HMOs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
withdrawal of health maintenance organizations (HMO) from the Federal
Employees&apos; Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), focusing on: (1) changes in
the number of HMOs participating in FEHBP from plan years 1994 to 2000;
(2) reasons why HMOs withdrew from FEHBP in plan years 1999 and 2000;
and (3) FEHBP enrollment experiences for HMOs that withdrew from the
program in 2000.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) for plan years 1999 and 2000, 136 HMOs withdrew from
FEHBP; (2) while a limited number of new plans entered FEHBP in 1999 and
2000, the withdrawals, combined with plans that either merged,
consolidated service areas, or left service areas reduced the number of
HMOs participating in FEHBP from 476 in 1996 to 277 HMOs in 2000; (3)
the growth or decline in the number of HMOs participating in FEHBP was
not always the result of plans entering or withdrawing from the program;
(4) some HMOs added new service areas, while others split their existing
service areas; (5) in other cases, HMOs merged, consolidated service
areas, or left service areas; (6) in any event, about 64,000 of the 4.1
million FEHBP enrollees were affected by HMOs&apos; decisions to withdraw in
2000; (7) according to Office of Personnel Management (OPM) officials
and representatives from HMOs that left FEHBP, the factors most
frequently cited for HMO withdrawals from the program in plan years 1999
and 2000 were insufficient enrollments, unpredictable plan
utilization/excessive risk, and noncompetitive premium rates; (8) in
addition to citing these as the major factors influencing plans&apos;
decisions to withdraw, these officials and representatives noted that
oftentimes it was a combination of these factors, rather than a single
factor, that caused a plan&apos;s withdrawal; (9) other factors that plan
representatives cited for withdrawing from FEHBP included mergers,
federal mandates to provide selected benefits, OPM&apos;s administrative
requirements, and saturated market areas; (10) however, plan
representatives and others with whom GAO spoke generally agreed that
mandates and administrative requirements would not have been major
factors contributing to a plan&apos;s decision to withdraw; (11) an official
from the Employee Benefit Research Institute told GAO that recent plan
withdrawals from FEHBP represented a market correction in that plans
with low FEHBP enrollments in areas dominated by large plans concluded
that they could not compete effectively and therefore withdrew; (12) OPM
plan enrollment information showed that 46 of the 62 HMOs that withdrew
from FEHBP in 2000 actually increased enrollments between 1998 and 1999,
12 plans lost enrollment between 1998 and 1999, and 4 plans only had
enrollment data for 1 year; (13) from 1998 to 1999, of the 46 HMOs that
increased enrollments, these increases numbered less than 100 enrollees
for 26 of these HMOs; and (14) in addition, of the 62 plans that
withdrew in 2000, 26 had fewer than 300 enrollees.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-00-100</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-100</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-00-100; Federal Employees&apos; Health Program: Reasons Why HMOs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Health insurance</topic>
 <topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic>
 <topic>Corporate mergers</topic>
 <topic>Insurance premiums</topic>
 <topic>Employee medical benefits</topic>
 <topic>Health resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Federal Employees Health Benefits Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>