<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038709a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-10-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>56 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GGD-00-1</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038709a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg00001</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GGD-00-1</reportNumber>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Reengineering (management)</subject>
 <subject>Customer service</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <subject>Personnel evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>IRS Employee Evaluations: Opportunities to Better Balance</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the extent to which
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employee evaluation system can
support the new mission statement during the period IRS will need to
revamp its performance management system, focusing on: (1) determining
the relative emphasis on revenue production, efficiency, and customer
service in enforcement employees&apos; annual written evaluations; (2)
identifying features of the evaluation process that might be used to
greater advantage to reinforce the importance of customer service; and
(3) describing IRS initiatives to promote customer service, including
those to encourage enforcement employees to be taxpayer oriented.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) IRS could take advantage of opportunities within the
evaluation process to reinforce the importance of customer service among
its frontline enforcement employees; (2) there are a number of reasons
for doing so; (3) most importantly, the evaluation process is not
aligned with IRS&apos; new mission statement because it emphasizes revenue
production more than customer service; (4) also, it is uncertain when a
new performance management system that IRS is planning will become fully
operational; (5) enforcement employees&apos; two most recent written
evaluations for the period ending June 1998 emphasized their revenue
production and efficiency skills more than their customer service
skills; (6) available evidence indicates that four features of the
evaluation process could be used to greater advantage to reinforce the
importance of customer service among enforcement employees; (7) if the
features were to be used more, however, IRS would need to consider the
potential implications for the way in which supervisors allocate their
time between these and other administrative tasks; (8) the narrative
portion an employee&apos;s written evaluation provides flexibility for
supervisors to focus on employees&apos; customer service skills; (9) midyear
progress reviews, which are required, provide supervisors with
opportunities to give interim feedback on aspects of case handling in
relation to customer service (and other) goals; (10) mandatory reviews
of sampling of completed cases present another opportunity for
supervisors to comment on customer service skills because these are ex
post facto examinations of documents prepared by employees to support
their case decisions; (11) field visits present an excellent opportunity
to reinforce customer service; (12) IRS has implemented a number of
initiatives to promote customer service; (13) it has: (a) revised its
strategic goals; (b) aligned them with its mission statement; and (c)
introduced organizational performance measures that are to balance
customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, and business results; (14)
in the meantime, IRS has taken several interim actions to encourage
enforcement employees to be taxpayer oriented; and (15) it has
incorporated into the employee evaluation process a new retention
standard relating to the fair and equitable treatment of taxpayers that
employees must meet at a passing level to retain their jobs.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1/html/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/GGD-00-1</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GGD-00-1</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/GGD-00-1; IRS Employee Evaluations: Opportunities to Better Balance;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Reengineering (management)</topic>
 <topic>Customer service</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>Personnel evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
</subject>
</mods>