United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 2008-09-12 monographic deposited born digital 65 p. GA 1.13:GAO-08-889 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889 P0b002ee180393054 f:d08889 DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-28 GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889 machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889 GAO-08-889 Appropriated funds Bankruptcy Budgeting Construction contracts Construction costs Cost analysis Cost control Facility security Federal courts Federal procurement Financial management Funds management Government facility construction Schedule slippages Security assessments Cost estimates Other Written Product A84157 Since the early 1990s, the General Services Administration (GSA) and the federal judiciary (judiciary) have been carrying out a multibillion-dollar courthouse construction initiative. In downtown Los Angeles, California, one of the nation's busiest federal district courts (L.A. Court), the federal judiciary has split its district, magistrate, and bankruptcy judges between two buildings--the Spring Street Courthouse and the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse. In 2000 the judiciary requested and GSA proposed building a new courthouse in downtown Los Angeles in order to increase security, efficiency, and space. In response, Congress authorized and appropriated about $400 million for the project. GAO was asked to provide information on the construction of the L.A. courthouse. This report answers: (1) What is the status of the construction of a new federal courthouse in Los Angeles? (2) What effects have any delays in the project had on its costs and court operations? (3) What options are available for the future of the project? GAO reviewed project planning and budget documents, visited the key sites in Los Angeles, and interviewed GSA and judiciary officials. In its comments, the judiciary indicated that the report reflects the project's general sequence of events and circumstances, and GSA partially agreed with the report's findings related to the delays. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889.pdf GAO-08-889 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-889 Other Written Product GAO-08-889; Federal Courthouse Construction: Estimated Costs to House the L.A. District Court Have Tripled and There Is No Consensus on How to Proceed; Appropriated funds Bankruptcy Budgeting Construction contracts Construction costs Cost analysis Cost control Facility security Federal courts Federal procurement Financial management Funds management Government facility construction Schedule slippages Security assessments Cost estimates