<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180382d9b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-07-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>24 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-08-876R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180382d9b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d08876r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-08-876R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Fees</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Foreign trade agreements</subject>
 <subject>Government collections</subject>
 <subject>Homeland security</subject>
 <subject>Import regulation</subject>
 <subject>Import restriction</subject>
 <subject>Importing</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>International agreements</subject>
 <subject>International cooperation</subject>
 <subject>International relations</subject>
 <subject>International trade</subject>
 <subject>International trade regulation</subject>
 <subject>International trade restriction</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Program management</subject>
 <subject>Systems analysis</subject>
 <subject>Taxes</subject>
 <subject>Trade agreements</subject>
 <subject>Trade policies</subject>
 <subject>Trade regulation</subject>
 <subject>Cost estimates</subject>
 <subject>Foreign countries</subject>
 <subject>AD/CV duty system</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <accountNo>A83056</accountNo>
 <law congress="110" isPrivate="false" number="161"></law>
 <congReport congress="110" number="84" type="S"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Agencies Believe Strengthening International Agreements to Improve Collection of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Would Be Difficult and Ineffective</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The United States and many of its trading partners have enacted
laws to remedy the unfair trade practices of other countries and 
foreign companies that cause injury to domestic industries. U.S. 
law authorizes the imposition of additional duties on importers  
to remedy these unfair trade practices. Specifically, antidumping
(AD) duties are imposed on imports that are &quot;dumped&quot; in the	 
United States (i.e., sales in the U.S. market at less than the	 
market price in the item&apos;s home market) and countervailing (CV)  
duties are imposed on imports that are subsidized by foreign	 
governments. Importers are responsible for paying all duties,	 
taxes, and fees on products when they are brought into the United
States (including AD/CV duties). Importers can be located either 
domestically or overseas. Since fiscal year 2001, U.S. Customs	 
and Border Protection (CBP), which is responsible for collecting 
import duties, has been unable to collect hundreds of millions of
dollars in AD/CV duties. In March 2008, we reported that over	 
$600 million in AD/CV duties were uncollected. Our analysis	 
revealed four key factors contributing to uncollected AD/CV	 
duties: (1) the retrospective component of the U.S. AD/CV duty	 
system, (2) &quot;new shipper&quot; reviews, (3) insufficiency of CBP&apos;s	 
standard bond requirements for importers, and (4) minimal	 
information required from importers. We identified two sets of	 
options for Congress and agencies to consider in attempting to	 
improve the collection of AD/CV duties. One option was to	 
eliminate the retrospective component of the U.S. AD/CV duty	 
system and make it prospective; the other was to adjust specific 
aspects of the current U.S. AD/CV duty system while retaining its
retrospective nature. Under the current U.S. AD/CV duty system,  
importers pay cash deposits equal to the estimated AD/CV duties  
at the time of importation, but the final duty amount is	 
determined much later and may exceed the amount of cash 	 
deposited. On average, this process takes more than 3 years,	 
during which importers could cease operations or become unable to
pay additional duties. To address this situation and help improve
the collection of AD/CV duties, we suggested several improvements
to Congress and executive branch agencies. As a result, this	 
report describes agencies&apos; views on (1) obstacles (if any) to	 
strengthening international agreements to help the United States 
collect AD/CV duties from importers without attachable assets in 
the United States and (2) whether strengthened international	 
agreements would improve duty collection.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-08-876R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-08-876R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-08-876R; Agencies Believe Strengthening International Agreements to Improve Collection of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Would Be Difficult and Ineffective;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Fees</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Foreign trade agreements</topic>
 <topic>Government collections</topic>
 <topic>Homeland security</topic>
 <topic>Import regulation</topic>
 <topic>Import restriction</topic>
 <topic>Importing</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>International agreements</topic>
 <topic>International cooperation</topic>
 <topic>International relations</topic>
 <topic>International trade</topic>
 <topic>International trade regulation</topic>
 <topic>International trade restriction</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Program management</topic>
 <topic>Systems analysis</topic>
 <topic>Taxes</topic>
 <topic>Trade agreements</topic>
 <topic>Trade policies</topic>
 <topic>Trade regulation</topic>
 <topic>Cost estimates</topic>
 <topic>Foreign countries</topic>
 <topic>AD/CV duty system</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 161 (110th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 110-161</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Senate Report 84 (110th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">S. Rept. 110-84</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>