<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180395c41">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-06-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>45 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-07-919</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180395c41</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d07919</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-07-919</reportNumber>
 <subject>Beneficiaries</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility criteria</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility determinations</subject>
 <subject>Employee training</subject>
 <subject>Employment</subject>
 <subject>Employment assistance programs</subject>
 <subject>International trade</subject>
 <subject>Occupational retraining</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Trade policies</subject>
 <subject>Program implementation</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A71694</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Trade Adjustment Assistance: Industry Certification Would Likely Make More Workers Eligible, but Design and Implementation Challenges Exist</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) is the nation&apos;s primary program
providing job training and other assistance to manufacturing	 
workers who lose their jobs due to international trade. For	 
workers to receive TAA benefits, the Department of Labor (Labor) 
must certify that workers in a particular layoff have lost their 
jobs due to trade. Congress is considering allowing entire	 
industries to be certified to facilitate access to assistance.	 
GAO was asked to examine (1) trends in the current certification 
process, (2) the extent to which the proposed industry		 
certification approach based on three petitions certified in 180 
days would increase eligibility and identify potential challenges
with this approach, and (3) the extent to which an approach based
on trade remedies would increase eligibility and identify	 
potential challenges. To address these questions, GAO analyzed	 
data on TAA petitions, mass layoffs, trade, production, and trade
remedies. GAO also interviewed Labor and ITC officials. GAO is	 
not making recommendations at this time. Labor reviewed the	 
report and did not provide comments. The ITC provided technical  
comments that have been incorporated as appropriate.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-07-919</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-919</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-07-919; Trade Adjustment Assistance: Industry Certification Would Likely Make More Workers Eligible, but Design and Implementation Challenges Exist;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Beneficiaries</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility criteria</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility determinations</topic>
 <topic>Employee training</topic>
 <topic>Employment</topic>
 <topic>Employment assistance programs</topic>
 <topic>International trade</topic>
 <topic>Occupational retraining</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Trade policies</topic>
 <topic>Program implementation</topic>
</subject>
</mods>