<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180381674">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-06-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-07-759</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180381674</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d07759</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-07-759</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Evaluation criteria</subject>
 <subject>Military aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Operational testing</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Source selection</subject>
 <subject>Systems evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Technical proposal evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Subcontractors</subject>
 <subject>Army Future Combat Systems</subject>
 <subject>Iraq</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A70570</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Acquisitions: Analysis of Processes Used to Evaluate Active Protection Systems</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Active Protection Systems (APS) protect vehicles from attack by
detecting and intercepting missiles or munitions. In 2005, the	 
lead systems integrator for the Army&apos;s Future Combat Systems	 
(FCS) program sought proposals for an APS developer and design	 
and to deliver APS prototypes on vehicles by fiscal year 2009.	 
Raytheon was chosen the APS developer. At the same time, the	 
Department of Defense&apos;s Office of Force Transformation (OFT)	 
evaluated near-term APS for potential use in Iraq. GAO was asked 
to review the Army&apos;s actions on APS/FCS: (1) the process for	 
selecting the subcontractor to develop an APS for FCS and if	 
potential conflicts of interest were avoided; (2) the timing of  
the trade study and if it followed a consistent methodology to	 
evaluate alternatives, and the results; (3) the role the Army and
Boeing played in selecting the developer; and (4) the process	 
followed to provide a near-term APS solution for current forces.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-07-759</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-759</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-07-759; Defense Acquisitions: Analysis of Processes Used to Evaluate Active Protection Systems;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Evaluation criteria</topic>
 <topic>Military aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Operational testing</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Source selection</topic>
 <topic>Systems evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Technical proposal evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Subcontractors</topic>
 <topic>Army Future Combat Systems</topic>
 <topic>Iraq</topic>
</subject>
</mods>