<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039068a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-07-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>7 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-07-1138R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039068a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d071138r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-07-1138R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Budget controllability</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Erroneous payments</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Military training</subject>
 <subject>Monitoring</subject>
 <subject>National Guard</subject>
 <subject>Pay</subject>
 <subject>Statistical data</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <accountNo>A73750</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Personnel: Air National Guard Has Taken Steps to Improve the Reliability of Personnel Strength Data, but More Needs to Be Done</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In September 2004, the Air National Guard (ANG) discovered
inaccuracies in its personnel strength data for recruits with no 
prior service assigned to pay groups F (attending Initial Active 
Duty Training, or IADT) and P (awaiting IADT). Specifically,	 
these data did not reflect an accurate accounting of the number  
of recruits in pay groups F and P. Those recruits attending IADT 
work full-time and are paid accordingly (pay group F), while	 
recruits waiting to attend IADT receive pay on a part-time basis 
at the rate of four drills per month (pay group P). The pay for  
those attending IADT is much higher than for those waiting to	 
attend IADT, so the effect of miscoding the pay groups on ANG&apos;s  
budget estimates can be considerable. In May 2007, we reported to
Congress that although ANG has taken reasonable steps to correct 
the errors in its personnel strength data, some problems still	 
exist with a key quality assurance tool (the Status Report Card  
process) and with the reliability of the alternate data being	 
reported while the inaccuracies are addressed. The purpose of	 
this correspondence is to inform Congress of the additional steps
we believe that ANG needs to take to ensure the reliability of	 
the personnel strength data being reported for the two pay	 
groups.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-07-1138R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-1138R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-07-1138R; Military Personnel: Air National Guard Has Taken Steps to Improve the Reliability of Personnel Strength Data, but More Needs to Be Done;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Budget controllability</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Erroneous payments</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Military training</topic>
 <topic>Monitoring</topic>
 <topic>National Guard</topic>
 <topic>Pay</topic>
 <topic>Statistical data</topic>
</subject>
</mods>