<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038b202">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-06-23</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>42 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-06-567</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038b202</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d06567</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-06-567</reportNumber>
 <subject>Allocation (Government accounting)</subject>
 <subject>Block grants</subject>
 <subject>Census</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Formula grants</subject>
 <subject>Medicaid</subject>
 <subject>Population statistics</subject>
 <subject>Statistical data</subject>
 <subject>Statistical methods</subject>
 <subject>1990 Decennial Census</subject>
 <subject>2000 Decennial Census</subject>
 <subject>Census Bureau Accuracy and Coverage</subject>
 <subject>Evaluation Program</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A55843</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Assistance: Illustrative Simulations of Using Statistical Population Estimates for Reallocating Certain Federal Funding</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Decennial census data need to be as accurate as possible because
the population counts are used for, among other purposes,	 
allocating federal grants to states and local governments. The	 
U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau) used statistical methods to estimate 
the accuracy of 1990 and 2000 Census data. Because the Bureau	 
considered the estimates unreliable due to methodological	 
uncertainties, they were not used to adjust the census results.  
Still, a key question is how sensitive are federal formula grants
to alternative population estimates, such as those derived from  
statistical methods? GAO was asked to identify (1) the top 20	 
formula grant programs based on the amount of funds targeted by  
any means, and (2) the amount of money allocated for Medicaid and
Social Services Block Grant (SSBG), and the prospective impact of
estimated population counts from the 1990 and 2000 Censuses on	 
state allocations for these two programs. Importantly, as agreed,
GAO&apos;s analysis only simulates the formula grant reallocations. We
used fiscal year 2004 Medicaid state expenditure and 2005 SSBG	 
state allocation data, the most recent data available.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-06-567</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-567</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-06-567; Federal Assistance: Illustrative Simulations of Using Statistical Population Estimates for Reallocating Certain Federal Funding;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Allocation (Government accounting)</topic>
 <topic>Block grants</topic>
 <topic>Census</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Formula grants</topic>
 <topic>Medicaid</topic>
 <topic>Population statistics</topic>
 <topic>Statistical data</topic>
 <topic>Statistical methods</topic>
 <topic>1990 Decennial Census</topic>
 <topic>2000 Decennial Census</topic>
 <topic>Census Bureau Accuracy and Coverage</topic>
 <topic>Evaluation Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>