<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a2d64">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2005-07-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>9 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-05-933R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a2d64</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d05933r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-05-933R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Defense budgets</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Investments</subject>
 <subject>Military research and development</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Weapons research and development</subject>
 <subject>Lasers</subject>
 <subject>Program implementation</subject>
 <subject>High-Energy Laser Technology Program</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <accountNo>A31417</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Department of Defense&apos;s Assessment Addresses Congressional Concerns but Lacks Detail on High Energy Laser Transition Plans</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000,
Congress directed the Department of Defense (DOD) to develop a	 
laser master plan to include identification of potential weapon  
applications, critical technologies, a development path for those
critical technologies, and the funding required to carry out the 
master plan. In response to this legislation, the High Energy	 
Laser (HEL) Executive Review Panel was formed and issued the HEL 
Master Plan on March 24, 2000. The Master Plan recommended	 
establishing a management structure for HEL technologies,	 
including a HEL Joint Technology Office (JTO) to execute	 
development and day-to-day management of a joint program to	 
revitalize HEL technologies. The plan also recommended		 
establishment of a HEL Technology Council--composed of senior	 
science and technology executives from the military services and 
agencies--to provide oversight and approval authority for JTO&apos;s  
programs. As a result of the Master Plan, JTO was formed in June 
2000. JTO collaborates with the military services and defense	 
agencies in order to develop and execute an investment strategy  
for HEL science and technology (S&amp;T) development. In the Floyd D.
Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001,  
Congress directed the Secretary of Defense to implement the	 
management and organizational structure specified in the Master  
Plan. The legislation also required the Secretary of Defense to  
designate a senior civilian official to head the HEL Technology  
Council as well as carry out responsibilities for HEL programs by
establishing priorities, coordinating the services&apos; and defense  
agencies&apos; efforts, identifying promising high-priority		 
technologies for funding, and preparing a detailed technology	 
plan to develop and mature those technologies. DOD&apos;s Deputy	 
Undersecretary of Defense for Science and Technology was	 
designated that official. In the conference report that 	 
accompanied the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization  
Act for Fiscal Year 2005, the conferees expressed concern that	 
the JTO may not be accelerating progress in HEL technology and	 
providing incentives to the services to invest in such		 
technologies. Accordingly, they required the Secretary of Defense
to submit a report to Congress on the implementation of the	 
fiscal year 2001 legislation and directed that the report	 
specifically address (1) the effectiveness of JTO in meeting its 
statutory goals, (2) whether JTO&apos;s structure has been effective  
in transitioning technologies to the warfighter, and (3) the	 
impact of DOD&apos;s decision to shift funding responsibility for JTO 
efforts from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to the 
Air Force. The conferees required the Secretary of the Defense to
provide this report by January 15, 2005, and asked GAO to review 
the report and provide an assessment to the Congressional	 
Committees by March 15, 2005. We received DOD&apos;s report in May	 
2005 and are providing our assessment of the report&apos;s		 
responsiveness to the conferees&apos; three requirements with this	 
correspondence.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-05-933R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-933R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-05-933R; Department of Defense&apos;s Assessment Addresses Congressional Concerns but Lacks Detail on High Energy Laser Transition Plans;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Defense budgets</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Investments</topic>
 <topic>Military research and development</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Weapons research and development</topic>
 <topic>Lasers</topic>
 <topic>Program implementation</topic>
 <topic>High-Energy Laser Technology Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>