United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 2004-11-19 monographic deposited born digital 31 p. GA 1.13:GAO-05-39R https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R P0b002ee18037cf79 f:d0539r DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-24 GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R GAO-05-39R Maintenance costs Military operations Military vessels Naval procurement Naval warfare Repair costs Weapons systems Schedule slippages DD(X) Destroyer Naval Surface Fire Support Modernization Program Correspondence A13853 Land-, air-, and sea-based components form the "fires triad" that is used to support Marine Corps amphibious assault operations. The sea-based part of the fires triad is referred to as Naval Surface Fire Support (NSFS). The retirement of the last Iowa class battleship left a void in the NSFS part of the fires triad. To field a replacement NSFS capability, the Navy developed a two-phased plan in 1994. In the near-term to midterm, it would modify the capability of 5-inch guns on existing destroyers and cruisers, and develop extended-range guided munitions for the modified 5-inch gun. In the far term, it would field a sufficient number of new destroyers fitted with an even-longerrange advanced gun system and ultimately a very-long-range electromagnetic gun or "Rail Gun." However, in 1996, congressional authorizers became concerned that the Navy would not be able to produce a replacement NSFS capability comparable to the battleships until well into the twenty-first century. In that year's Defense Authorization Act, the Congress directed the Secretary of the Navy to restore at least two Iowa class battleships to the naval vessel registry until a capability was developed equal to or greater than that provided by the battleships. By 1999 the Navy had placed the Iowa and Wisconsin battleships back on the naval vessel registry and has been maintaining them in an inactive state since then. In recent years, the Navy's efforts to develop a NSFS replacement capability have not progressed as quickly as planned. Given concerns about the gap in NSFS capability, the Chairman, Subcommittee on Projection Forces House Committee on Armed Services requested that we review (1) the validated requirements for NSFS, (2) the estimated cost and schedule for reactivating and modernizing two Iowa class battleships to provide NSFS, and (3) the status of Navy efforts to develop a replacement NSFS capability. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R.pdf GAO-05-39R https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-05-39R Correspondence GAO-05-39R; Information on Options for Naval Surface Fire Support; Maintenance costs Military operations Military vessels Naval procurement Naval warfare Repair costs Weapons systems Schedule slippages DD(X) Destroyer Naval Surface Fire Support Modernization Program Public Law 104-106