<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f214">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-11-13</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>23 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-04-86</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f214</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d0486</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-04-86</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military cost control</subject>
 <subject>Military personnel</subject>
 <subject>Military reenlistment bonuses</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Payments</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Program management</subject>
 <subject>Employee retention</subject>
 <subject>Military occupational specialties</subject>
 <subject>DOD Selective Reenlistment Bonus Program</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A08851</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Personnel: DOD Needs More Effective Controls to Better Assess the Progress of the Selective Reenlistment Bonus Program</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The Department of Defense (DOD) uses the Selective Reenlistment
Bonus (SRB) program to reenlist military personnel in critical	 
specialties. In fiscal years 1997-2003, the program budget rose  
138 percent, from $308 million to $734 million. In fiscal year	 
2003, the House Appropriations Committee directed the Secretary  
of Defense to reassess program efficiency and report on five	 
concerns: (1) how effective the program is in correcting	 
retention shortfalls in critical occupations, (2) how replacement
guidance will ensure targeting critical specialties that impact  
readiness, (3) how DOD will match program execution with	 
appropriated funding, (4) how well the services&apos; processes for	 
administering the program work, and (5) advantages and		 
disadvantages of paying bonuses in lump sum payments. The	 
committee also directed GAO to review and assess DOD&apos;s report.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-04-86</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-86</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-04-86; Military Personnel: DOD Needs More Effective Controls to Better Assess the Progress of the Selective Reenlistment Bonus Program;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military cost control</topic>
 <topic>Military personnel</topic>
 <topic>Military reenlistment bonuses</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Payments</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Program management</topic>
 <topic>Employee retention</topic>
 <topic>Military occupational specialties</topic>
 <topic>DOD Selective Reenlistment Bonus Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>