<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180380d36">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-10-20</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>11 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-04-149R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180380d36</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d04149r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-04-149R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal regulations</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Military pay</subject>
 <subject>Military systems analysis</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Payroll systems</subject>
 <subject>Systems design</subject>
 <subject>Schedule slippages</subject>
 <subject>DOD Forward Compatible Military Pay</subject>
 <subject>System</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <accountNo>A08742</accountNo>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="106"></law>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="208"></law>
 <law congress="107" isPrivate="false" number="314"></law>
 <USCode title="31">
                      <section number="720"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Military Personnel: DFAS Has Not Met All Information Technology Requirements for Its New Pay System</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In early January 2003, we initiated a review of the Defense
Integrated Military Human Resource System (DIMHRS) to get an	 
understanding of the program, its goals, its present status, and 
the problems it is designed to resolve. During this review, we	 
became aware that in April 2003 the Department of Defense (DOD)  
authorized the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to  
initiate a pilot project to demonstrate its ability to develop an
interim military pay system, called Forward Compatible Military  
Pay, before DIMHRS is fully operational. DFAS maintains that an  
interim system should be developed as soon as possible for two	 
reasons: (1) the planned personnel and pay system that DOD is	 
currently developing as part of the larger DIMHRS will be	 
implemented later than its projected target date of December 2006
and (2) the current military pay system--the Defense Joint	 
Military Pay System--is aging, unresponsive, and fragile and has 
become a major impediment to efficient and high quality customer 
service. It is estimated that the Forward Compatible Military Pay
system could be operational by March 2006 at a design and	 
development cost ranging from about $17 million to $30 million.  
Since the planned interim Forward Compatible Military Pay system 
is considered an information technology acquisition program under
DOD Acquisition Regulations, DFAS must comply with specific legal
and administrative requirements before moving forward with the	 
development of this project. In this regard, DFAS must comply	 
with requirements contained in the Bob Stump National Defense	 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, Office of the Under	 
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Memorandum, and the		 
Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-04-149R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-04-149R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-04-149R; Military Personnel: DFAS Has Not Met All Information Technology Requirements for Its New Pay System;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal regulations</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Military pay</topic>
 <topic>Military systems analysis</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Payroll systems</topic>
 <topic>Systems design</topic>
 <topic>Schedule slippages</topic>
 <topic>DOD Forward Compatible Military Pay</topic>
 <topic>System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 31 Section 720</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">31 U.S.C. 720</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 106 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-106</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 208 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-208</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 314 (107th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 107-314</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>