<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a3a0d">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-06-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>12 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-03-937T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a3a0d</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d03937t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-03-937T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Hiring policies</subject>
 <subject>Judges</subject>
 <subject>Labor force</subject>
 <subject>Policy evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Work measurement</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A07327</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Judgeships: General Accuracy of District and Appellate Judgeship Case-Related Workload Measures</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO appeared before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and
Intellectual Property, House Committee on the Judiciary to	 
discuss the results of our review and assessment of case-related 
workload measures for district court and courts of appeals	 
judges. Biennially, the Judicial Conference of the United States,
the federal judiciary&apos;s principal policymaking body, assesses the
judiciary&apos;s needs for additional judgeships. If the Conference	 
determines that additional judgeships are needed, it transmits a 
request to Congress identifying the number, type (courts of	 
appeals, district, or bankruptcy), and location of the judgeships
it is requesting. In assessing the need for additional district  
and appellate court judgeships, the Judicial Conference considers
a variety of information, including responses to its biennial	 
survey of individual courts, temporary increases or decreases in 
case filings, and other factors specific to an individual court. 
However, the Conference&apos;s analysis begins with the quantitative  
case-related workload measures it has adopted for the district	 
courts and courts of appeals--weighted case filings and adjusted 
case filings, respectively. These two measures recognize, to	 
different degrees, that the time demands on judges are largely a 
function of both the number and complexity of the cases on their 
dockets. Some types of cases may demand relatively little time	 
and others may require many hours of work.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-03-937T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-937T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-03-937T; Federal Judgeships: General Accuracy of District and Appellate Judgeship Case-Related Workload Measures;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Hiring policies</topic>
 <topic>Judges</topic>
 <topic>Labor force</topic>
 <topic>Policy evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Work measurement</topic>
</subject>
</mods>