<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038f9ac">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-01-27</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>12 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-03-324R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038f9ac</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d03324r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-03-324R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Competition</subject>
 <subject>Competitive procurement</subject>
 <subject>Military research and development</subject>
 <subject>Research and development contracts</subject>
 <subject>Weapons research and development</subject>
 <subject>DOD National Missile Defense Program</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <accountNo>A06009</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Missile Defense: Events Related to Contractor Selection for the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>You asked us, as a follow-on to our recent review of the early	 
sensor tests for the exoatmospheric kill vehicle (EKV), to look  
into the circumstances surrounding Boeing Lead Systems		 
Integrator&apos;s (LSI) selection of Raytheon&apos;s EKV device for further
testing. Specifically, you asked us to (1) determine whether	 
there was a misuse of Raytheon&apos;s proprietary information by the  
Boeing EKV team, as had been reported in the media, and whether  
these events affected the planned competition for an EKV	 
contractor; (2) determine whether a request for proposals (RFP)  
was ever prepared, whether proposals were submitted, whether	 
formal criteria were used to evaluate the two systems, and	 
whether a formal technical comparison or analysis of the two	 
systems was used to select between them; (3) describe the basis  
for the selection of Raytheon; (4) identify whether the decision 
was made by BMDO or Boeing LSI, and, if the decision was made by 
Boeing LSI, determine the extent to which BMDO was aware of the  
circumstances surrounding the decision; and (5) identify the	 
amount of money the U.S. government spent to develop the two EKV 
systems that were to be competed against each other and, if one  
of the contractors was excluded from the competition, determine  
whether any effort was made to recoup the money paid to that	 
contractor.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-03-324R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-03-324R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-03-324R; Missile Defense: Events Related to Contractor Selection for the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Competition</topic>
 <topic>Competitive procurement</topic>
 <topic>Military research and development</topic>
 <topic>Research and development contracts</topic>
 <topic>Weapons research and development</topic>
 <topic>DOD National Missile Defense Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>