<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037f391">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-11-19</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>42 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-78</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037f391</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d0278</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-78</reportNumber>
 <subject>Mass transit operations</subject>
 <subject>Mass transit funding</subject>
 <subject>Labor force</subject>
 <subject>Employment</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A02475</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Transit Labor Arrangements: Most Transit Agencies Report Impacts Are Minimal</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Concerns have arisen about the 37 year old statutory provision
commonly known as Section 13(c). Before the Federal Transit	 
Administration (FTA) may make grants to transit applicants, the  
Department of Labor (DOL) must certify that fair and equitable	 
arrangements are in place to protect mass transit employees	 
affected. Section 13(c) requires that the arrangements contain	 
provisions for continuation of collective bargaining rights and  
the protection of employees against a worsening of their	 
positions. Once certified, the arrangements are incorporated into
the grant agreement between FTA and the grantee. Critics claim	 
that Section 13(e) greatly increases the cost of transit	 
operations, hinders transit agencies&apos; efforts to adopt new	 
technology, and creates constraints on the efficient operation of
transit systems. Supporters claim that Section 13(c) has enhanced
labor-management stability and has helped to improve		 
communication and working relationships between management and	 
labor. The transit agencies GAO surveyed reported that Section	 
13(c) had a minimal impact on their (1) labor costs, (2) ability 
to adopt new technologies, and (3) ability to modify transit	 
operations. Transit agencies reported that Section 13(c) has	 
delayed the award of federal grants and has presented a burden	 
regarding time, efforts, and resources. Transit officials said	 
that growth in the transit industry may act to mitigate the	 
effects of Section 13(c).</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-78</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-78</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-78; Transit Labor Arrangements: Most Transit Agencies Report Impacts Are Minimal;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Mass transit operations</topic>
 <topic>Mass transit funding</topic>
 <topic>Labor force</topic>
 <topic>Employment</topic>
</subject>
</mods>