<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039f108">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-02-27</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>20 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-472T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039f108</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d02472t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-472T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Economic stabilization</subject>
 <subject>Insurance</subject>
 <subject>Insurance companies</subject>
 <subject>Terrorism</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A02814</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Terrorism Insurance: Rising Uninsured Exposure to Attacks Heightens Potential Economic Vulnerabilities</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In the closing months of last year insurers stated that they
could not afford to continue providing coverage for potential	 
terrorism losses. Considerable debate has taken place on what the
federal government can do to keep commercial insurance companies 
involved in providing terrorism insurance, even without the	 
protection that they normally receive from reinsurance. Because  
insurance companies believe that neither the frequency nor the	 
magnitude of future terrorist losses can be estimated, they are  
withdrawing themselves from the market. Insurance for losses from
terrorism is disappearing, particularly for large businesses and 
those perceived to be at some risk. This withdrawal is happening 
fastest among reinsurers. Because the insurers&apos; withdrawal has	 
been gradual, the extent of the potential economic consequences  
is still unclear. What is clear is that in the absence of	 
terrorism insurance, terrorist attacks would dramatically	 
increase direct losses to businesses, employees, lenders, and	 
other noninsurance entities. Furthermore, should the government  
decide to intervene after a future attack it, would do so without
readily available claims-processing and payment mechanisms that  
exist in the insurance industry. Even in the absence of an actual
terrorist event, there are indications that some sectors of the  
economy are beginning to experience difficulties because some	 
properties and businesses are unable to find sufficient terrorism
coverage at any price. If allowed to go unchecked, these	 
difficulties are likely to increase as more insurance contracts  
come up for renewal over the next year. The resulting economic	 
drag could slow economic recovery and growth.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-472T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-472T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-472T; Terrorism Insurance: Rising Uninsured Exposure to Attacks Heightens Potential Economic Vulnerabilities;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Economic stabilization</topic>
 <topic>Insurance</topic>
 <topic>Insurance companies</topic>
 <topic>Terrorism</topic>
</subject>
</mods>