<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180373533">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-02-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-468T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-468T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180373533</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d02468t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-468T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-468T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-468T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Authorization</subject>
 <subject>Congressional oversight</subject>
 <subject>Export regulation</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Congressional/executive relations</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A02842</accountNo>
 <law congress="90" isPrivate="false" number="629"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Export Controls: Issues to Consider in Authorizing a New Export Administration Act</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Congress now has before it two bills that would enact a new legal
basis for controls over exports of dual use goods and services. A
new Export Administration Act will need to balance stakeholder	 
interests, assess the national security risks presented by end	 
users, and balance the needs of exporters with foreign policy and
national security interests. Both bills seek to balance these	 
interests by involving the departments of Commerce, Defense and  
State. However, the lack of clear provisions raises questions	 
about the balance between U.S. foreign policy and national	 
security interests with economic interests. The House bill places
greater emphasis on protecting foreign policy and national	 
security interests, while the Senate bill emphasizes economic	 
interests. Moreover, a series of GAO reports indicate the new	 
legislation alone will not ensure that regulations and practices 
are implemented as Congress intended. Congress will need to	 
oversee executive branch compliance with the law.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-468T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-468T.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-468T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-468T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-468T; Export Controls: Issues to Consider in Authorizing a New Export Administration Act;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Authorization</topic>
 <topic>Congressional oversight</topic>
 <topic>Export regulation</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Congressional/executive relations</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 629 (90th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 90-629</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>