United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 2002-02-22 monographic deposited born digital 35 p. GA 1.13:GAO-02-333 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333 P0b002ee18039403d f:d02333 DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-28 GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333 machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333 GAO-02-333 Air pollution control Cost control Cost effectiveness analysis Hazardous substances Potable water Proposed legislation Radiation exposure hazards Water pollution control Water quality Other Written Product A02733 The Safe Drinking Water Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set a drinking water standard for radon. In a proposed rule issued in November 1999, EPA presented a unique and complex drinking water regulation for radon. GAO found that EPA's analysis of the costs to implement the proposed radon rule has several strengths. EPA's estimates of the typical costs for water systems to buy and install radon removal technologies--a key determinant of total national costs--are reasonable for estimating national compliance costs. Moreover, EPA used recommendations from an expert panel to estimate the costs to install and maintain radon removal equipment. EPA also developed a range of annual cost estimates, rather than a single estimate, to account for uncertainty about the extent to which the less costly alternative standard will be adopted by states. EPA's analysis of the national annual costs to comply with its proposed radon drinking water rule has several limitations that, if corrected, would likely increase EPA's best estimate of these costs. EPA made two errors in estimating the various costs associated with programs to reduce radon levels in indoor air under the alternative standard--one that understated radon testing and mitigation costs by $37 million and another that overstated administrative costs by $31 million--resulting in a combined understatement of costs by $6 million. In addition, EPA's exclusion of "mixed" water systems, which use a mix of groundwater and surface water sources, effectively understated compliance costs by about $17 million. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333.pdf GAO-02-333 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-333 Other Written Product GAO-02-333; Drinking Water: Revisions to EPA's Cost Analysis for the Radon Rule Would Improve Its Credibility and Usefulness; Air pollution control Cost control Cost effectiveness analysis Hazardous substances Potable water Proposed legislation Radiation exposure hazards Water pollution control Water quality