<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180373213">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-12-10</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>30 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-288T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180373213</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d02288t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-288T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Budget administration</subject>
 <subject>Social security benefits</subject>
 <subject>Income maintenance programs</subject>
 <subject>Retirement benefits</subject>
 <subject>Disability benefits</subject>
 <subject>Evaluation criteria</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Medicare Program</subject>
 <subject>Social Security Program</subject>
 <subject>Disability Insurance Program</subject>
 <subject>Social Security Trust Fund</subject>
 <subject>Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Program</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A02554</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Social Security: Issues in Evaluating Reform Proposals</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>This report discusses how best to ensure the long-term viability
of our nation&apos;s Social Security program. Social Security not only
represents the foundation of our retirement income system; it	 
also provides millions of Americans with disability insurance and
survivor&apos;s benefits. The system faces both solvency and 	 
sustainability challenges in the longer term. Although Social	 
Security&apos;s Trust Funds will not be exhausted until 2038,	 
according to the latest trustees&apos; report&apos;s intermediate 	 
projections, the program&apos;s cash demands on the rest of the	 
federal government will begin much sooner. Focusing on the trust 
fund solvency alone is not sufficient. Aiming for sustainable	 
solvency would increase the chance that future policymakers would
not have to face these difficult questions on a recurring basis. 
GAO has developed criteria for evaluating Social Security reform 
proposals: financing sustainable solvency, balancing adequacy and
equity, and implementing and administering reforms. These	 
criteria aim to balance financial and economic considerations	 
with benefit adequacy and equity issues and the administrative	 
challenges associated with various proposals. GAO&apos;s recent report
on Social Security and income adequacy provides some specific	 
insights on one of its criteria. First, no single measure of	 
adequacy provides a complete picture; each measure reflects a	 
different outlook on what adequacy means. Second, given the	 
currently projected long-term financial shortfall of the program,
it is important to compare proposals to both benefits at	 
currently promised levels and benefits funded at current tax	 
levels. Third, various approaches to benefit reductions, in	 
particular, would have differing effects on adequacy.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-288T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-288T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-288T; Social Security: Issues in Evaluating Reform Proposals;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Budget administration</topic>
 <topic>Social security benefits</topic>
 <topic>Income maintenance programs</topic>
 <topic>Retirement benefits</topic>
 <topic>Disability benefits</topic>
 <topic>Evaluation criteria</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Medicare Program</topic>
 <topic>Social Security Program</topic>
 <topic>Disability Insurance Program</topic>
 <topic>Social Security Trust Fund</topic>
 <topic>Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>