<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180389008">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-03-15</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>78 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-282</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180389008</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d02282</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-282</reportNumber>
 <subject>Evaluation criteria</subject>
 <subject>Health hazards</subject>
 <subject>Housing repairs</subject>
 <subject>Low income housing</subject>
 <subject>Public housing</subject>
 <subject>Rental housing</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>HUD 2020 Management Reform Plan</subject>
 <subject>HUD Public and Indian Housing</subject>
 <subject>Information Center System</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A02852</accountNo>
 <law congress="106" isPrivate="false" number="377"></law>
 <USCode title="42">
                      <section number="1437d"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Public Housing: New Assessment System Holds Potential for Evaluating Performance</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) spends $7
billion annually to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing	 
for low-income households in about 14,000 rental properties	 
nationwide. Yet, many public housing properties have been unsafe 
and unsanitary for several decades. To identify and correct these
problems, HUD began a Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS) to 
evaluate the performance of public housing authorities. Although 
HUD is still testing and revising PHAS, it has begun to designate
certain housing authorities as troubled and to assign them to	 
recovery centers, where they receive technical and other	 
assistance. HUD also created the Public and Indian Housing	 
Information Center (PIC) database to collect information on	 
funding, compliance, and other problems that fall outside the	 
scope of PHAS. PHAS includes four performance indicators: (1) the
physical condition of the properties, (2) the financial condition
of the housing authority, (3) the authority&apos;s management	 
operations, and (4) residents&apos; satisfaction with their living	 
conditions. HUD develops a score for each indicator and, starting
in this fiscal year, plans to use the scores for all four	 
indicators to determine whether housing authorities are troubled.
So far, HUD has used only the management operations score to	 
designate housing authorities as troubled. The PIC risk 	 
assessment uses the total PHAS score and information about	 
funding and compliance issues to classify troubled and		 
nontroubled housing authorities as high, moderate, or low risk.  
According to HUD, the field offices focus their monitoring	 
resources on the nontroubled high-risk authorities in an effort  
to correct their problems before the authorities are designated  
as troubled. GAO found inconsistencies between the PHAS and PIC  
assessment. The five public housing authorities GAO visited,	 
which had not been designated as troubled under PHAS but had been
classified as moderate to high risk under PIC, had various	 
problems. However, even under the same authority, some		 
developments were well or adequately maintained, while others had
cosmetic, structural, or health and safety problems. HUD may	 
provide technical assistance at a housing authority through	 
either a field office team or a troubled agency recovery center. 
HUD may also impose sanctions on a housing authority or intervene
in its operations to compel the authority to correct problems.	 
For more serious, long-standing problems, HUD may put a housing  
authority into receivership. In some instances, HUD may enter	 
into special agreements with housing authorities, giving them the
flexibility to address unique problems. Although these options	 
have the potential for solving problems at public housing	 
authorities, it is still to early to evaluate their		 
effectiveness. Moreover, in the past, the options have not always
fully addressed the problems or the housing authorities have not 
sustained the improvements.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-282</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-282</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-282; Public Housing: New Assessment System Holds Potential for Evaluating Performance;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Evaluation criteria</topic>
 <topic>Health hazards</topic>
 <topic>Housing repairs</topic>
 <topic>Low income housing</topic>
 <topic>Public housing</topic>
 <topic>Rental housing</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>HUD 2020 Management Reform Plan</topic>
 <topic>HUD Public and Indian Housing</topic>
 <topic>Information Center System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 1437d</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 1437d</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 377 (106th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 106-377</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>