<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180374bc5">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-05-09</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-234R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-234R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180374bc5</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d02234r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-234R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-234R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-234R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Information technology</subject>
 <subject>Investments</subject>
 <subject>Information systems</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>IRS Enterprise Life Cycle</subject>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <accountNo>A03300</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>IRS Guidance on Economic Analyses in Investment Business Cases</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>IRS Guidance on Economic Analyses in Investment Business Cases
(09-MAY-02, GAO-02-234R).					 
                                                                 
Because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) plans to spend $2.9	 
billion to modernize its information systems, GAO reviewed the	 
latest draft of the Investment Decision Management Business Case 
Procedure. The procedure provides guidance for the Integrated	 
Project Teams to justify information technology (IT) investments.
This letter presents GAO&apos;s observations on the guidance where	 
modifications or additions would ensure that the economic	 
analyses in IRS business cases are consistent with commonly	 
accepted principles. IRS&apos; draft guidance on business case	 
documentation represents an important step toward ensuring that  
IRS management has relevant information on which to base its	 
critical IT investment decisions. However, some aspects of IRS&apos;  
guidance are inconsistent with commonly held principles of public
sector cost-benefit analysis. Most important, the guidance does  
not require the computation of a comprehensive social net present
value (NPV)--the standard for deciding whether a government	 
investment can be justified on economic grounds. The two partial 
NPV computations that IRS&apos; guidance requires are inappropriate	 
because they do not incorporate the proper values for all	 
relevant benefits and costs for investment projects with	 
significant effects outside of IRS. In addition, IRS&apos; two NPV&apos;s  
are not additive, so even if all benefits and costs were properly
valued, decision makers would be unable to determine the overall 
net value of an investment.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-234R/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-234R.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-234R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-234R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-234R; IRS Guidance on Economic Analyses in Investment Business Cases;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Information technology</topic>
 <topic>Investments</topic>
 <topic>Information systems</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>IRS Enterprise Life Cycle</topic>
</subject>
</mods>