<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180371967">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-01-10</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>25 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-02-205</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180371967</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d02205</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-02-205</reportNumber>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Electronic forms</subject>
 <subject>Electronic government</subject>
 <subject>Income taxes</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <subject>Tax returns</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A02645</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Tax Administration: Electronic Filing&apos;s Past and Future Impact on Processing Costs Dependent on Several Factors</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>From fiscal years 1997 through 2000, the number of individual and
business tax returns filed electronically increased from 23	 
million to 41 million. During the same period, the Internal	 
Revenue Service&apos;s (IRS) expenditures for submission processing	 
grew from $795 million to $924 million, an increase of 16	 
percent. Because it costs less to process an electronic return	 
than a paper return, a growth in processing costs seemed	 
improbable. Interviews with IRS officials and an analysis of	 
relevant documentation identified several factors that limited	 
the impact of electronic filing. Specifically, (1) the overall	 
number of individual and business tax returns filed increased,	 
and the resources needed to process that increase partially	 
offset the resources saved by processing more electronic returns;
(2) the number of the most costly to process individual income	 
tax returns filed on paper essentially stayed the same; and (3)  
the number of individual income tax returns filed on paper and	 
received during the peak filing period stayed relatively the	 
same, and peak processing needs drive the resources needed to	 
process individual paper returns. Although electronic filing	 
increased, so did the demands placed on paper processing staff.  
In particular, (1) processing changes increased the workload for 
units responsible for reviewing returns for completeness and	 
coding them for entry data, and correcting errors; (2) because	 
most electronic filers still sent a paper signature document to  
IRS, the work done by paper processing staff was not entirely	 
eliminated when taxpayers filed electronically; and (3) 	 
front-line paper processing staff spent increasing amounts of	 
time on activities, including training, not specifically related 
to processing returns. Future reductions in processing costs as a
result of electronic filing are possible.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-02-205</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-02-205</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-02-205; Tax Administration: Electronic Filing&apos;s Past and Future Impact on Processing Costs Dependent on Several Factors;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Electronic forms</topic>
 <topic>Electronic government</topic>
 <topic>Income taxes</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>Tax returns</topic>
</subject>
</mods>