<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180391466">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-07-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>63 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-831</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180391466</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d01831</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-831</reportNumber>
 <subject>Airline industry</subject>
 <subject>Airline regulation</subject>
 <subject>Commercial aviation</subject>
 <subject>Competition</subject>
 <subject>Prices and pricing</subject>
 <subject>Travel costs</subject>
 <subject>Fare discounts</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A01490</accountNo>
 <law congress="106" isPrivate="false" number="181"></law>
 <USCode title="49">
                      <section number="41712"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Aviation Competition: Restricting Airline Ticketing Rules Unlikely to Help Consumers</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Passengers on the same commercial airline flight may pay fares
that vary widely. This fact has led to dissatisfaction by some	 
passengers who believe their ticket prices are too high and that 
airline ticketing practices are unfair. In an effort to reduce	 
their cost of flying, some passengers have attempted to use	 
&quot;hidden-city&quot; and &quot;back-to-back&quot; ticketing opportunities.	 
Hidden-city ticketing occurs when a passenger books a flight to  
one city but purposely deplanes at an intermediate city. Though  
never intending to make the last leg of the flight, the passenger
purchases the ticket because it is cheaper than a ticket to the  
intermediate city. Back-to-back ticketing occurs when a passenger
buys two round-trip tickets that include a Saturday night stay	 
but either uses only half the ticket coupons or uses all the	 
coupons out of sequence. This practice results in a lower price  
than would be possible by purchasing round-trip tickets that did 
not include a Saturday night stay. Most airlines expressly forbid
the use of hidden-city and back-to-back ticketing. When 	 
passengers purchase tickets, they enter into a legally binding	 
contract with the carrier to receive transportation between two  
locations at specified prices and to use tickets exactly as	 
issued. In this report, GAO reviews (1) the factors that airlines
consider when setting fares, (2) the factors that create	 
hidden-city ticketing and the pricing practices that foster	 
back-to-back ticketing practices, (3) the potential effects on	 
airfares and service, especially to consumers in small		 
communities, of a legislative requirement to permit hidden-city  
ticketing, and (4) the potential effects on airfares and service 
of a legislative requirement to permit back-to-back ticketing.	 
GAO found that (1) when setting fares for each market, airlines  
consider the amount of competition from other airlines offering  
similar &quot;products&quot;, (2) hidden-city opportunities may arise when 
a greater amount of competition exists for travel between spoke  
communities (i.e. destinations located &quot;beyond&quot; a hub airport)	 
than on routes to and from hub communities, and where airfares in
those markets reflect such competition, (3) back-to-back	 
ticketing opportunities occur because airlines maximize their	 
profits by setting higher fares for purchase by passengers who	 
normally travel during peak times, generally during the week	 
(business passengers), and lower fares for purchase by passengers
who travel at off-peak times and stay at their destination over  
the weekend (leisure passengers). Passengers who would otherwise 
not qualify for discounted fares might be able to circumvent the 
airlines&apos; Saturday night stay requirements to obtain lower fares,
(4) if legislation required airlines to permit hidden-city	 
ticketing, airfares in certain markets could increase		 
immediately--especially in markets including smaller communities,
and (5) if back-to-back ticketing were permitted, airlines would 
likely decrease the attractiveness of such fares to business	 
travelers by increasing fares for tickets designed for leisure	 
passengers, adding more restrictions to their use, and		 
potentially reducing service in some markets.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-831</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-831</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-831; Aviation Competition: Restricting Airline Ticketing Rules Unlikely to Help Consumers;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Airline industry</topic>
 <topic>Airline regulation</topic>
 <topic>Commercial aviation</topic>
 <topic>Competition</topic>
 <topic>Prices and pricing</topic>
 <topic>Travel costs</topic>
 <topic>Fare discounts</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 49 Section 41712</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">49 U.S.C. 41712</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 181 (106th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 106-181</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>