<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803725cc">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-12-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>62 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-70</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803725cc</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d0170</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-70</reportNumber>
 <subject>Government facility construction</subject>
 <subject>Federal courts</subject>
 <subject>Data collection</subject>
 <subject>Judges</subject>
 <subject>Trials</subject>
 <identifier>Judiciary Space and Facilities program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <law congress="106" isPrivate="false" number="58"></law>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="113">
                      <pages pages="430"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Courthouse Construction: Sufficient Data and Analysis</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The judiciary is in the midst of a multibillion-dollar courthouse
construction program. New courthouses are being constructed to
accommodate new judgeships created because of increasing caseloads and
to replace obsolete courthouses occupied by existing judges. For many
years there has been a debate about whether district judges could share
courtrooms to save taxpayer dollars without compromising effective
judicial administration. In 1997 GAO issued a report calling for better
courtroom use data and analysis to enhance facility planning.In
response, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AOUSC),
contracted with Ernst &amp; Young to conduct a study of the judiciary&apos;s
facilities program in 1999. As part of the study AOUSC asked Ernst &amp;
Young to conduct a thorough analysis of courtroom utilization,
assignment, and sharing by judges. GAO was then asked to review the
report to determine whether the study provided sufficient data and
analysis to show if courtroom sharing would be feasible. GAO found that
the Ernst &amp; Young study did not provide the type of data and analysis
that GAO and other research organizations such as the Rand Institute for
Civil Justice and the Federal Judicial Center have determined would be
needed to help resolve the courtroom-sharing issue.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-70</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-70</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-70; Courthouse Construction: Sufficient Data and Analysis;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Government facility construction</topic>
 <topic>Federal courts</topic>
 <topic>Data collection</topic>
 <topic>Judges</topic>
 <topic>Trials</topic>
 <topic>Judiciary Space and Facilities program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 113 Page 430</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">113 Stat. 430</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 58 (106th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 106-58</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>