<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180386de9">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-05-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>7 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-695T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180386de9</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d01695t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-695T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Buy national policy</subject>
 <subject>Contract oversight</subject>
 <subject>Defense procurement</subject>
 <subject>Limited procurement</subject>
 <subject>Waivers</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A00939</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Contract Management: Purchase of Army Black Berets</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The Army&apos;s decision to issue black berets to all of its forces in
just eight months placed enormous demands on the military&apos;s	 
procurement system. To meet this challenge, the Department of	 
Defense (DOD) increased the domestic supplier&apos;s production,	 
awarded contracts to known foreign sources and procured berets	 
from additional sources. This testimony discussed DOD&apos;s 	 
contracting strategy, including (1) the contracting procedures	 
DOD used to buy the berets and (2) the circumstances surrounding 
waivers to the Berry Amendment, a statutory requirement to buy	 
clothing from domestic suppliers. The Defense Logistics Agency	 
(DLA) took several steps to expedite award of the contracts. As a
result of these actions, however, DLA failed to (1) provide for  
full and open competition as required by the Competition in	 
Contracting Act of 1984 or (2) obtain a review of these contract 
actions from the Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization	 
Office for possible small business participation. GAO also found 
that authority to waive the Berry Amendment was delegated to	 
DLA&apos;s Director and Senior Procurement Executive by the Principal 
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and  
Logistics), but later canceled to ensure that any request for a  
waiver to the Berry Amendment received attention at an		 
appropriate level within DOD. GAO concluded that the eight-month 
deadline placed DOD in a high-risk contracting situation. In	 
their eagerness to serve the customer, DOD procurement officials 
chose to shortcut normal contracting procedures. The deadline	 
allowed very little time to plan for the purchase of the berets  
and little room to respond to production problems.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-695T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-695T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-695T; Contract Management: Purchase of Army Black Berets;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Buy national policy</topic>
 <topic>Contract oversight</topic>
 <topic>Defense procurement</topic>
 <topic>Limited procurement</topic>
 <topic>Waivers</topic>
</subject>
</mods>