<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038ec1e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-05-03</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>18 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-659T</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038ec1e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d01659t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-659T</reportNumber>
 <subject>Aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Contract costs</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Cost overruns</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement</subject>
 <subject>Personnel recruiting</subject>
 <subject>Risk management</subject>
 <subject>Ships</subject>
 <subject>Coast Guard Deepwater Capability</subject>
 <subject>Replacement Project</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <accountNo>A00948</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Coast Guard: Actions Needed to Mitigate Deepwater Project Risks</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The Coast Guard is in the final stages of planning the largest
procurement project in its history--the Deepwater Capability	 
Replacement Project. This project will likely cost over $10	 
billion or more and take 20 years or more to complete. The Coast 
Guard has already spent about $116 million on the project&apos;s	 
design and is asking for $338 million this year to begin the	 
acquisition phase. This testimony discusses the major risks	 
associated with the project. GAO found four major areas in which 
the project is vulnerable. They are (1) planning the project	 
around annual funding levels far above what the administration	 
has told the Coast Guard it can expect to receive, (2) keeping	 
costs under control in the contract&apos;s later years, (3) ensuring  
that procedures and personnel are in place for managing and	 
overseeing the contractor once the contract is awarded, and (4)  
minimizing potential problems with developing unproven		 
technology. GAO also identified the following key areas that will
need to be addressed. The Coast Guard needs (1) effective human  
capital practices, (2) a systems integrator to establish a	 
management organization and systems necessary to manage the major
subcontracts for deepwater equipment; (3) to establish a general 
policy on subcontractor relationships, (4) to ensure that its	 
budget requests are consistent with Office or Management and	 
Budget guidelines on full funding of useful segments, (5) to	 
implement a subjective rating system to measure contractor	 
performance and (6) to develop and implement a carefully	 
thought-out contingency plan which identifies and analyzes the	 
implication of potential actions should the systems integrator	 
not perform as expected or walk away from the project. This	 
testimony summarizes the May report, GAO-01-564.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-659T</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-659T</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-659T; Coast Guard: Actions Needed to Mitigate Deepwater Project Risks;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Contract costs</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Cost overruns</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement</topic>
 <topic>Personnel recruiting</topic>
 <topic>Risk management</topic>
 <topic>Ships</topic>
 <topic>Coast Guard Deepwater Capability</topic>
 <topic>Replacement Project</topic>
</subject>
</mods>