<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039e635">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-07-06</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>26 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:GAO-01-568</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039e635</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:d01568</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568</accessId>
 <reportNumber>GAO-01-568</reportNumber>
 <subject>Laboratories</subject>
 <subject>Technology transfer</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Cooperative agreements</subject>
 <subject>DOE Technology Transfer Initiative</subject>
 <subject>DOE Technology Parnership Program</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <accountNo>A01359</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Technology Transfer: DOE Has Fewer Partnerships, and They Rely More on Private Funding</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Congress enacted the National Competitiveness Technology Transfer
Act to encourage federal laboratories operated by contractors to 
enter into cooperative research and development agreements	 
(CRADA) with businesses, universities, and other private	 
partners. This act was designed to improve the United States&apos;	 
competitive position in the world economy by facilitating the	 
transfer of technology from federal laboratories to U.S.	 
businesses. This report reviews the National Nuclear Security	 
Administration&apos;s (NNSA) (1) use of CRADAs and (2) views on the	 
advantages and disadvantages of CRADAs. GAO found that NNSA has  
reduced its use of CRADAs while entering into more agreements	 
fully funded by private partners. Dedicated funding for CRADAs	 
was gradually phased out and program managers at the laboratories
were supposed to rely on regular research funding to make up the 
shortfall. However, NNSA laboratory managers have stated that	 
because the funding has not been replaced with research funds,	 
their laboratories have either prematurely terminated many CRADAs
or required the private partners to fully fund the work.	 
According to NNSA officials, CRADAs offers both advantages and	 
disadvantages. CRADAs have enabled laboratories to recruit and	 
retain experienced staff and have improved U.S.&apos; businesses	 
position in the global economy. However, CRADAs also compete for 
limited funding and generally take longer to execute because of  
the complexity of the agreements.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568/html/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO-01-568</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-GAO-01-568</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO-01-568; Technology Transfer: DOE Has Fewer Partnerships, and They Rely More on Private Funding;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Laboratories</topic>
 <topic>Technology transfer</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Cooperative agreements</topic>
 <topic>DOE Technology Transfer Initiative</topic>
 <topic>DOE Technology Parnership Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>